Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)

Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Sun, 07 December 2014 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D1D1A6F24; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:22:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JaFpTVQ1VeQp; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:22:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F7761A1BC9; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 17:22:25 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79376d000000ceb-41-54835b9a94a7
Received: from EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.75]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 03.2E.03307.A9B53845; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 20:40:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC001.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 6 Dec 2014 20:22:21 -0500
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)
Thread-Index: AQHPy5pZch2KBOE5ZEKuHN4DSxvQ9ZyCApgAgAHdmnA=
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2014 01:22:21 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B8AE1B5@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <20140908192308.6BD2B180015@rfc-editor.org> <11ca01d010a2$fff2c130$ffd84390$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <11ca01d010a2$fff2c130$ffd84390$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF1121B8AE1B5eusaamb103erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXSPt+7s6OYQg3dH+S1+9Nxgtvj08BKz xZM5N1gstu9cwmLRMuUds0VH81sWi9YfO1gc2D1e9s9h9Ng56y67R8uRt6weS5b8ZPL4sKmZ zWPF5pWMAWxRXDYpqTmZZalF+nYJXBknf3xkLPieUbH48HymBsYn0V2MnBwSAiYSF6+tYoWw xSQu3FvP1sXIxSEkcIRR4u++bVDOMkaJzQ83glWxCRhJvNjYww5iiwjoS3Sfm8YOUsQscJhJ ov1WB2MXIweHsIC5xKKJmRA1FhLbn01jgbCtJE6/ugM2h0VARWLu0udMIDavgK/Ei2vrwWYK CWRIXNg9jxHE5hSwllj7YjJYnBHouu+n1oDVMwuIS9x6Mp8J4moBiSV7zjND2KISLx//g/pG SWLO62vMEPX5Ej0XXrNB7BKUODnzCcsERtFZSEbNQlI2C0kZRFxHYsHuT2wQtrbEsoWvmWHs MwceMyGLL2BkX8XIUVqcWpabbmSwiREYscck2HR3MO55aXmIUYCDUYmH94NFU4gQa2JZcWXu IUZpDhYlcd5ZtfOChQTSE0tSs1NTC1KL4otKc1KLDzEycXBKNTBWrcueNM26ICqS+77Jky9N gcI3G5rnqTPEFbFJ9/6aJHRxI/PxywuycwvTJhYvrBSvKw5r+HY8S6D7228+XbmnZiKzD8hz sM7Wfzk7aX3p5JdTwxT8fUvO2Gekdf/2daj2PjWNbe6Bq1wHNJMvOb6VnhfyTWtKW5x20zbe d+d+3f2Ubp1k9EeJpTgj0VCLuag4EQD7eeyOuQIAAA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/fFZqSmQ0JfcyVKf5u2nMnbxSDfU
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "akatlas@gmail.com" <akatlas@gmail.com>, "dbrungard@att.com" <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 01:22:28 -0000

Hi Adrian,
thank you for your suggestions. My motivation to make all-1s reserved was to have symmetry with already reserved all-0s value. If authors of the RFC believe it is unnecessary then I'm more than happy with the proposed resolution.

                Regards,
                                Greg

From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 11:49 PM
To: Gregory Mirsky
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org; Attila Takacs; don.fedyk@hp.com; hejia@huawei.com; akatlas@gmail.com; lberger@labn.net; dbrungard@att.com
Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)


Hi Greg,



I'm returning to this after an indecent interval.



I checked with IANA and they are OK that we can make this sort of change with an Errata Report and they are happy.



So now we have to agree what it should say.



There is an error in your suggested change, I think because in the first table you show 65533 as IETF review, and in the second as reserved for experimentation.



I am keen to make only the minimal changes to fix the obvious bugs. Therefore I think there is no need to reserve 65535 and it can remain as an experimental value.



That leaves us with...



    IANA has created the "OAM Sub-TLVs" sub-registry of the "RSVP-TE OAM

    Configuration Registry" as follows:



    Range       | Note                         | Registration Procedures

    ------------+------------------------------|------------------------

    0-31        | Generic Sub-TLVs             | IETF Review

   32-65533    | Technology-specific Sub-TLVs | IETF Review

    65534-65535 | Experimental Sub-TLVs        | Reserved for

                                               |   Experimental Use



    IANA has populated the registry as follows:



       Sub-TLV Type | Description                   | Reference

       -------------+-------------------------------+----------

           0        | Reserved                      | [RFC7260]

           1        | OAM Function Flags Sub-TLV    | [RFC7260]

           2-65533  | Unassigned                    |

       65534-65535  | Reserved for Experimental Use | [RFC7260]



Is everyone OK with that change?



Thanks,

Adrian