Re: [CCAMP] draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp and draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib

<Manuel.Paul@telekom.de> Wed, 09 July 2014 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F11A0647 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:01:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_AVOID=2.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDSETqYEE-yk for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail93.telekom.de (tcmail93.telekom.de [80.149.113.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 043881A0645 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he113599.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.65.118]) by tcmail91.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 09 Jul 2014 15:01:11 +0200
Received: from HE101454.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.150]) by HE113599.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.65.118]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:01:10 +0200
From: <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>
To: <ggrammel@juniper.net>, <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 15:01:07 +0200
Thread-Topic: draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp and draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib
Thread-Index: Ac+XAT5ztVyFVTboTtq7YqBZHj6KHgEc6cpw
Message-ID: <08AFB17A021B974CBAA6BA84FA19B43CA0EE2A49B3@HE101454.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <d3895ef54fd2478597c93c06eca5c327@BN1PR05MB041.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <d3895ef54fd2478597c93c06eca5c327@BN1PR05MB041.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_08AFB17A021B974CBAA6BA84FA19B43CA0EE2A49B3HE101454emea1_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/fMpYxww4jLVjj1UN7EvsgmlcTa0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp and draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 13:01:45 -0000

Hello CCAMPers,

I worked through the last ccamp minutes and try to catch the issues with these both documents.
The values in the drafts are corresponding to ITU-T G.698.2.
Why should it not be possible to set power and wavelength in the Black Link case?  Every transponder could be configured  and maintained in the same manner.
Thanks,
Manuel

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gert Grammel
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:57 PM
To: CCAMP (ccamp@ietf.org)
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp and draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib

The authors of  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dharinigert-ccamp-g-698-2-lmp/ and https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-galikunze-ccamp-g-698-2-snmp-mib/
Put new versions out and would encourage discussion on the list. We'd like to collect input before the meeting to a void last-minute surprises. We also work in parallel on a draft Liaison request to clarify with SG15 Q6 and Q14 to clarify comments made at previous ccamp meetings.

As a reminder: the drafts define parameters to enable management and Link Management of G.698.2 compliant interfaces.
-------------------------------------
Gert Grammel