[CCAMP]Re: IPR polling - draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11

[Young Lee <[e-mail]>]

Hi Daniele,

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft."

Regards,
Young




On Wed, Sep 11, 2024, 11:42 AM Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, CCAMP,
>
>
>
> We anticipated that we would handle RFC9093bis and optical impairment
> topology as a cluster, and we will, but this doesn’t prevent us from
> managing IPR polling and WG last call separately (more efficient). Hence
> we’ll start with the IPR polling for RFC9093 bis.
>
>
>
> This is the IPR polling in preparation for the WG last call of
> draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis-11.
>
>
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
>
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>
>
>
> or
>
>
>
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
> answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not
> you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>
>
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele
>
>
>