Re: [CCAMP] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3F9120396; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iuwqs1wNmTfM; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2493F120305; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 554C3D7CFBD5C5F6CE4C; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:13:06 +0100 (IST)
Received: from DGGEMM423-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.40) by LHREML710-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:13:05 +0100
Received: from DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.72]) by dggemm423-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.40]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:12:21 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org>, "Daniele Ceccarelli" <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tlJ3MgTm8gT2JqZWN0aW9uIG9uIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtY2Nh?= =?utf-8?B?bXAtcnN2cC10ZS1iYW5kd2lkdGgtYXZhaWxhYmlsaXR5LTE0OiAod2l0aCBD?= =?utf-8?Q?OMMENT)?=
Thread-Index: AQHU7ehSEGScCmL1D0qe2jUi4D2KJKY3FNon
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:12:20 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FCFBDC2F5@DGGEMM528-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <155471350660.6393.17445335809418847224.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155471350660.6393.17445335809418847224.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.203.246.156]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/hNQH32XJ9gYDh-mUQbMJKt7F9ks>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:13:11 -0000

Hi Eric, 

Thanks for the comments, please see reply inline below.

BR,
Amy
________________________________________
发件人: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker [noreply@ietf.org]
发送时间: 2019年4月8日 16:51
收件人: The IESG
抄送: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org; Daniele Ceccarelli; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com; ccamp@ietf.org
主题: Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMENTS
========

C1) Section 3.1 "Availability TLV" is a little too generic IMHO, should rather
be named "Bandwidth availability TLV"
[Amy]  I'm ok to to renamed it.  

C2) Section 3.1, the availability encoding by a float is possibly not the
optimum one esp with 3 bytes 'reserved'. I would have expected something
(perhaps too simple ?) such as one byte where 'n' means availability of 1-10**n
(for example, 3 means 1-10**-3 == 0.999). But, this is a detail.
[Amy] Since the OSPF extension RFC8330 use the floating-point number, here we would like to continue using it. 

NITS
====

N1) Section 3.1, s/MUST be less than 1and/MUST be less than 1 and/
[Amy] will fix the nits.