Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03

"BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <> Wed, 27 August 2014 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC7C1A033D for <>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.867
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k8sVIZR13_KB for <>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D8EC1A0334 for <>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [] (EHLO by with ESMTP id (envelope-from <>); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:59:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53fd3b79040453a7-e0a53effdee7e8f804ee9d90801cde9f7f265656
Received: from unknown [] (EHLO by over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id (envelope-from <>); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:59:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53fd3b78329f17b0-442066209165589a038a97d97a9a24a3e365f332
Received: from (localhost []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7R1xHiB013252; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:59:17 -0400
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7R1x6u5013194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:59:09 -0400
Received: from ( []) by (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:58:55 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:58:55 -0400
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03
Thread-Index: Ac/A9BBTNwjX6sh/RzqmlJaYXMz7VQAgFbyAAAkpV5A=
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:58:54 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8153FDA8EMISOUT7MSGUSRDE_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=TNjyvSZa c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=zhhmU1NXjNIA:10 a=-OopZoTjQrAA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=Er9]
X-AnalysisOut: [9A_N7Gj8A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32R]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=bmvWBvp-Kp1UOZW]
X-AnalysisOut: [lrewA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=2JOtklbuwVsA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=Hz7IrDYlS0cA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=7a070pAYF-IViZ5T1scA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10]
X-AnalysisOut: [ a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=t]
X-AnalysisOut: [XsnliwV7b4A:10 a=RXQcprl87yqS2PMj:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
Cc: "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:59:25 -0000

Hi Pavan,

Yes, you are right. We have done the IPR poll so there is no need to respond.

Sorry for the confusion. We miss our secretary, Daniele, who helps us track and is still busy with higher priority items (new life support☺).


From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram []
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-beeram-ccamp-network-assigned-upstream-label-03

Deborah, Hi!

We have already gone through this exercise for this draft (Thread link - Are we required to do this again?


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:07 AM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <<>> wrote:
Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)

As part of the preparation for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any  contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and

Thank you,

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.

CCAMP mailing list<>