[CCAMP] 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 12 September 2014 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BB61A8723 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mS7R9boL-Dy8 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 10BD71A86E2 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:04:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 28014 invoked by uid 0); 12 Sep 2014 19:04:09 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 12 Sep 2014 19:04:09 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id qR401o00B2SSUrH01R433Z; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:04:08 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=F6LEKMRN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=u9EReRu7m0cA:10 a=Qr3DpD38lusA:10 a=cgtLGxXfalEA:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=A1qroQ7y_MHFI8TmJEgA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=WpEuNs/mIAzmRKFP3nlpR9kh0Erd4HRPApOltQONN/Y=; b=BCgY8TYii4zd/u8MsNtUoDcOvAN7J1kpv0dXh4DTuLLli66tk4BGYF9oNhrvGf7K8TdaHU1TpGsPKwANSxOqgqOgABC2Arl07bGecpjxhDbui1UkWAB3tr1YXfDzvFnl;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:50806 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1XSW8X-0000LB-69; Fri, 12 Sep 2014 13:04:01 -0600
Message-ID: <541343A5.8080408@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:04:05 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/idpUiHwuhw4Y6VgE5qJPD1E4Gt0
Subject: [CCAMP] 2nd WG Last Call: draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 19:04:20 -0000

All,

This mail begins another (and hopefully final) working group last call on:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09

This additional last call is being initiated as a result of the scope of
changes since the 1st last call, see:

https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-06.txt&url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-09.txt

This working group last call ends on September 26.  Comments should be
sent to the CCAMP mailing list.  Please remember to include the
technical basis for any comments.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
ready for publication", are welcome!
^^^^^----<<--- This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Lou (and Deborah)