[CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4803 (3831)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 12 December 2013 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049DB1ADE88 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:21:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QwFTk6mlSPjQ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EC91ADF47 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 4338E7FC397; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:21:38 -0800 (PST)
To: tnadeau@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, stbryant@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk, lberger@labn.net, dbrungard@att.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131212152138.4338E7FC397@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:21:38 -0800
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4803 (3831)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:21:47 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4803,
"Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR) Management Information Base".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4803&eid=3831

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000015,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000012,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }

   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x02,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000016,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000013,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }


Corrected Text
--------------
   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000015,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000012,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }

   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000016,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000013,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }


Notes
-----
The entries in the mplsXCTable are indexed by {mplsXCIndex, mplsXCInSegmentIndex, mplsOutSegmentIndex}. All XC entries for the same LSP should share a common value of mplsXCIndex because mplsTunnelXCPointer can be set to point to the first entry and then all of the other entries can be found.

The error in the example in Section 6 is that it shows a different value of mplsXCIndex for the reverse direction cross-connects. It should be set to the same value as is used for the forward direction cross-connect.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC4803 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR) Management Information Base
Publication Date    : February 2007
Author(s)           : T. Nadeau, Ed., A. Farrel, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG