[CCAMP] Post WG LC technical change in general-constraints-ospf-te-06

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 20 January 2014 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E57D1A01F1 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:52:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JAAUALseTxIN for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alt-proxy31.mail.unifiedlayer.com (alt-proxy31.mail.unifiedlayer.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F3771A0263 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 11:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20247 invoked by uid 0); 20 Jan 2014 19:52:22 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) ( by oproxy17.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2014 19:52:22 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=+Yb1PUoAYrz7nYFKOJXFV4mfro/iqOr6x/jR7vDi8t8=; b=aBWuPCKnK4krkTSLfNH432ujd75xS0ME4SWTBLjZb9xoRZnB8I7yu/KDXvC9uYqeCmtrboReQEiFHTb3BC/0eFvY0jr3l52PAN+xMkMDtbANBzGPj0J2+78ijSoQuNR4;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([]:53922 helo=[]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1W5KtS-00079e-Ae for ccamp@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:52:22 -0700
Message-ID: <52DD7E75.4090709@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:52:21 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <20131223231241.10535.47988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131223231241.10535.47988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20131223231241.10535.47988.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth authed with lberger@labn.net}
Subject: [CCAMP] Post WG LC technical change in general-constraints-ospf-te-06
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 19:52:26 -0000


At the end of October (as part of LC) I asked the Authors:
> - You define a new top-level TLV, the Generic Node Attribute TLV.  Did
> you consider using the Node Attribute TLV defined in RFC5786? Why not
> use it?

The rev published at the end of December (see below) made a change to
use the Node Attribute TLV.  I personally like this change, but the
change wasn't explicitly reviewed on the list.  Given that I expect to
put in the publication request for this document shortly, I wanted to
highlight this technical change to the WG and to confirm that the
document reflects the consensus of the WG.

If you have any comments on the changes in the latest rev of the draft,
please send them to the list.  Stating that you support (or even already
implemented) the changes is an acceptable comment.

Much thanks,
Lou (co-chair and document shepherd)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action:
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:12:41 -0800
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
CC: ccamp@ietf.org

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
 This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement Plane
Working Group of the IETF.

        Title           : OSPF-TE Extensions for General Network Element
        Authors         : Fatai Zhang
                          Young Lee
                          Jianrui Han
                          Greg Bernstein
                          Yunbin Xu
	Filename        : draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te-06.txt
	Pages           : 13
	Date            : 2013-12-23

   Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) can be used to
   control a wide variety of technologies including packet switching
   (e.g., MPLS), time-division (e.g., SONET/SDH, Optical Transport
   Network (OTN)), wavelength (lambdas), and spatial switching (e.g.,
   incoming port or fiber to outgoing port or fiber). In some of these
   technologies, network elements and links may impose additional
   routing constraints such as asymmetric switch connectivity, non-
   local label assignment, and label range limitations on links. This
   document describes Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) routing protocol
   extensions to support these kinds of constraints under the control
   of GMPLS.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There's also a htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

CCAMP mailing list