Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model

Lou Berger <> Wed, 24 October 2012 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFB121F8C45 for <>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.371
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.894, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9SUH7CpEdf4N for <>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DF4B21F8C35 for <>; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 09:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4296 invoked by uid 0); 24 Oct 2012 16:40:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ( by with SMTP; 24 Oct 2012 16:40:05 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=xpOQSTWAgLgf3NW1U18t/FBJ16QFO9p39D2yrgB156w=; b=zvHkftD0JLNphMK1IpYv5r4oBItqEpia/Ikevlu/pLagIrY61IPf/oiIbO7ZVPNtn1Pb18Al9N4t4oYhOOyzVE+Q4gnMuvuspIa/4k+d5KlmeRNV9n3Vf+2ros9dGv1p;
Received: from ([]:37363 helo=[]) by with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <>) id 1TR3zw-0001Dr-VB; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:40:05 -0600
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:40:01 -0400
From: Lou Berger <>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {} {sentby:smtp auth authed with}
Cc: CCAMP <>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:40:32 -0000

	If you are listed on the to line you are listed in the above draft as
an Author or Contributor and I believe have not responded to the message
included below.

Can you please respond to this message (and leave CCAMP cc'ed). And
state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If you answer yes, please also state:
"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

Thank you,

On 9/28/2012 10:20 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> Thank you,
> CCAMP WG Chairs
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list