Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 01 August 2014 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E4F1A00D2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ExTEbrfpe6aO for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EE391A0143 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:25:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 1853 invoked by uid 0); 1 Aug 2014 03:25:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 1 Aug 2014 03:25:53 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw4 with id ZMRo1o00A2SSUrH01MRr84; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 03:25:51 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OcELUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=WrhVjQHxoPwA:10 a=A68hd6JcikYA:10 a=MKMuUdMyT54A:10 a=HFCU6gKsb0MA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=I0CVDw5ZAAAA:8 a=fACzdzQf_cTd3N8naUQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=1QvL6Sxj0m9XaGFJXKk+mT1W1vGWTSgENmaRsTnWbkg=; b=uhNyLIRUlF3vHvPTJ1jEZ483pKgdnyodySBXHiYUD1lkILNCuR+m33zJGxOBeYG8GLMO42WZnjRd9ilWUd9OEqoQ1EmY2yaGIrjozHVjhtKMolf2Wntw0e05U5UQZ0da;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:52527 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1XD3TZ-0005HC-Fg; Thu, 31 Jul 2014 21:25:49 -0600
Message-ID: <53DB08DD.9010800@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:26:21 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
References: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A00D35@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com> <53DA24A5.4070003@labn.net> <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A05659@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <9D50FCE7413E3D4EA5E42331115FB5BC14A05659@xmb-rcd-x03.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/kjlnwqZSD2YCJLcxIn2hKyU-8c0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] IANA-related comments draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 03:25:56 -0000

On 7/31/2014 11:17 AM, Matt Hartley (mhartley) wrote:
> Lou,
>
>> Looking at
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/gmpls-sig-parameters/gmpls-sig-
>> parameters.xhtml
>> you'll see various policies have been used/suggested, including the
>> combination I mention.  Perhaps we, as a WG, should agree, on default
>> policy for the GMPLS registry...
> I think that might be a good idea. It would be useful to have some solid guidelines for this sort of thing.

Something to discuss once we have a WG document on the topic ;-)

Lou

>
> Cheers
>
> Matt
>