Re: [CCAMP] Draft Text for ITU-T - CCAMP Liason regarding Flexi-grid

fu.xihua@zte.com.cn Tue, 18 March 2014 06:33 UTC

Return-Path: <fu.xihua@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E374B1A0658; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FRT_BELOW2=2.154, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, T_FRT_BELOW2=0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tam6JuIEsG4s; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:33:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx6.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B51A0657; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 23:33:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.168.119]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id 4A3B85E648; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:33:15 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse02.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.21]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 1CD7B725F35; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:33:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse02.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id s2I6XFGY030739; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:33:15 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from fu.xihua@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <D7D7AB44C06A2440B716F1F1F5E70AE53FB23DC1@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
To: Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFD8D21453.D491AE4A-ON48257C9F.0023736F-48257C9F.0024039F@zte.com.cn>
From: fu.xihua@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:31:08 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2014-03-18 14:33:13, Serialize complete at 2014-03-18 14:33:13
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0024039B48257C9F_="
X-MAIL: mse02.zte.com.cn s2I6XFGY030739
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/l-r_wO1AbcsMgxw65bhKdb_ivfc
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Draft Text for ITU-T - CCAMP Liason regarding Flexi-grid
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 06:33:41 -0000

Hi Iftekhar,

If you refer to current "in force" G.709 or G.872, you can't get any 
describtion on an OCh-P is supported by multiple network media channels. 
This is what I mean.

Xihua




Iftekhar Hussain <IHussain@infinera.com> 
2014-03-18 ÏÂÎç 12:46

ÊÕ¼þÈË
"fu.xihua@zte.com.cn" <fu.xihua@zte.com.cn>cn>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" 
<huubatwork@gmail.com>
³­ËÍ
CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>rg>, CCAMP <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org>
Ö÷Ìâ
RE: [CCAMP] Draft Text for ITU-T - CCAMP Liason regarding Flexi-grid






Hi,
 
Regarding OCh-P, thee text is referring to the ¡°in force¡± ITU doc 
namely,  G.872, and requesting clarification from the ITU experts. What do 
you mean it is not defined by ITU?
 
Thanks,
Iftekhar
From: fu.xihua@zte.com.cn [mailto:fu.xihua@zte.com.cn] 
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 6:48 PM
To: huubatwork@gmail.com
Cc: CCAMP; CCAMP
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Draft Text for ITU-T - CCAMP Liason regarding 
Flexi-grid
 

Hi All, 

I have a few minor changes to draft text. 
The relationship between optical tributary signal from Q6 and network 
media channel from Q12 is 1 to 1. 
ITU-T hasn't reach aggreement to use terminology OCh-P which is supported 
by multiple medial channels. I suggest we don't need to  mention this. 
We should only mention when this requirement will be documented in ITU-T 
Recommendation. This requirement may be described as "An OTUCn is 
supported by multiple network media channels. These NMCs must be 
co-routed. They must be recoveried and cross-connected  at the same time." 



Xihua 



Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> 
·¢¼þÈË:  "CCAMP" <ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> 
2014-03-18 ÉÏÎç 01:20 


Çë´ð¸´ ¸ø
huubatwork@gmail.com



ÊÕ¼þÈË
Oscar Gonz¨¢lez de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>es>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org> 
³­ËÍ

Ö÷Ìâ
Re: [CCAMP] Draft Text for ITU-T - CCAMP Liason regarding Flexi-grid
 








Hola Oscar and Ramon.

Thank you for preparing this liaison.

> We have prepared a first draft of the text for the liaison ITU-T - IETF
> CCAMP regarding clarifications in Flexi¨CGrid. Thanks for the
> contributions sent to us by email.
>
> We would gladly appreciate your feedback in the liaison text. Please
> find attached the proposed text with comments from a review by Deborah.
> Also, for those of you allergic to non-standard file formats, please
> find bellow the plain text:

I have some comments/remarks added in the attached file because
it was almost impossible to insert in the plain text.

Hasta pronto, Huub.


-- 
*****************************************************************
              Çë¼Çס£¬ÄãÊǶÀÒ»ÎÞ¶þµÄ£¬¾ÍÏñÆäËûÿһ¸öÈËÒ»Ñù
[¸½¼þ "db_liaison_rev_5_hvh.docx" ±» ¸¶Îý»ª117829/user/zte_ltd ɾ³ý
]_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp