Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry
"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 29 January 2016 18:15 UTC
Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC2D1A907B; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:15:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mI6GJ9XGWual; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:15:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B827A1A8AFD; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:15:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=24989; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454091312; x=1455300912; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=sfNUoqrxRe0Eq5TLEdKlga7Ftko3dH1itMtIU1DEV+w=; b=WU52lVg/1OHFhePxMoy+7ZMNwdgbLY7v1X4oOFbiAfx2jlsidVE3V3RA R+UWKsc1mDCo06R1PkJsA7QU1izLwGR+ivkMCduAOc121VH+TXOdoCTOd No/hLSyTVPKCOq1XyGQt3o7pOWCA8bNyJBy7o+/6/jXTUTWQoJN08DSJQ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APAgCDq6tW/49dJa1egm5MUm0GhCaELLE4AQ2BYyKFbQKBNDgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEELT4OEAIBCBEDAQEBIQcHIREUCQgBAQQBDQWIBgMSDgO8Gw2EFAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAREEhg2EN4I3ghsNCYQEBY1ciRIBhUaGEYFzgVuNFoZ9g2+DUAEeAQFCg2xqiAF8AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.22,365,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="68377851"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2016 18:15:11 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u0TIFBhU024451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:15:11 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com (64.101.220.158) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:15:10 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) by XCH-RTP-018.cisco.com ([64.101.220.158]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:15:10 -0500
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry
Thread-Index: AdFZJrMzDUhiWqCnQTuL7YOHQ6ZYFwAhOmJwAEVYSYA=
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:15:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D2D11597.15FCF9%zali@cisco.com>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8527ED6BA@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4816190722@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE4816190722@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.152.43]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2D1159715FCF9zaliciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/lNOfQBG0GVYDLo7DWuHtFYJBwd4>
Cc: "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org>, "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 18:15:16 -0000
Hi Thanks Adrian, Deborah, Chairs and all for the input. Authors will revised the draft based on the comments. Thanks Regards ... Zafar From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com<mailto:daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>> Date: Friday, January 29, 2016 at 3:18 AM To: "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>> Cc: "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org>>, "huubatwork@gmail.com<mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com>" <huubatwork@gmail.com<mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com>>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS) (db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>)" <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>> Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry WG, authors, The discussion on the OTN additional signal type drafts triggered a further discussion on the OTN signal type sub-registry draft that ended up with the decision to send the draft back to the WG for some fixing. Here a summary of the discussion and way forward for the 2 drafts: draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry - Fix the editorial part as suggested by Deborah below - IANA section needs to be updated indicating the registry and the following registration policies: "Standards Action" (for Standards Track documents) and "Specification Required" (for other documents). The designated expert is any current CCAMP WG chair. - A new short Last Call will be issued as soon as the new version will be available. draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type - Adrian's comments to be addressed: (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/VNQKqOCJVS9WbQxoeBxfwPDENUY ) - Intended status: Informational - Have G.sup43 as normative reference - Have draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry as normative reference - State that the document requests code points from the not standards track part of the registry. - The last call will be extended to end together with the last call of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry one (as this document is depending on it). Thanks Daniele From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3546@att.com] Sent: mercoledì 27 gennaio 2016 18:30 To: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org> Cc: ccamp-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry@ietf.org>; huubatwork@gmail.com<mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com> Subject: AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry CCAMP, In doing my AD review of this draft, I found the IANA Considerations section confusing and have returned the draft to the WG. To have both Standards Action and IETF Review specified is an overlap. I've discussed with your Chairs and they have a proposal to discuss with you. I would hope this is non-controversial and can be done quickly (can be a shortened WG Last Call) and we can get on with publishing the document. When fixing, I recommend removing one of the two paragraphs from the Introduction as they are duplicates. It's ok the draft is short and to the point. As this draft is forward looking for the registry, it would be best to generalize vs. repeating text from the other draft on Sup43, so I recommend removing the 1st paragraph and keeping the second paragraph (with some tweaks). Thanks, Deborah
- [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-… BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig… Matt Hartley (mhartley)
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-sig… Matt Hartley (mhartley)