Re: [CCAMP] Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts

John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net> Tue, 07 August 2012 22:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jdrake@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3809C21F853E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.468, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rxIm00GUONgu for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8041821F8587 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCGSya2rM6avU7PTYGOb56LSLYVm/M71@postini.com; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:12:27 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 15:10:57 -0700
From: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:10:55 -0700
Thread-Topic: Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts
Thread-Index: Ac106YTWFkimJqV8Romx8WJ8Trxryw==
Message-ID: <ED393A2A-5ACE-4529-A529-EAD0A334139A@juniper.net>
References: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A5A9667A34@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <502190CA.9050305@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <502190CA.9050305@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "dbrungard@att.com" <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Last Call for OTN Routing and Signaling Drafts
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:12:28 -0000

Lou,

Yes it is and I'm sorry for my late response.  I would check with Daniele and Fatai but I would hope within a month.  We have been working on these for quite some time and they seem quite stable.

Thanks,

John

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 7, 2012, at 6:03 PM, "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> John,
>    I take it that this message is in response to:
> 
> On 8/3/2012 5:14 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>> Subject: [CCAMP] For discussion: Planned milestone update
>> Dec 2012 - Submit G.709 enhancements framework for IESG review
>> Dec 2012 - Submit G.709 enhancements solutions for IESG review
> 
> What date are you proposing?
> 
> I generally feel that the milestone date should be an upper limit and
> that reaching a milestone early is good, while missing one is not.
> 
> Lou
> 
> On 8/7/2012 5:56 PM, John E Drake wrote:
>> Lou and Deborah,
>> 
>> Given that we expeditiously address the remaining small number of
>> issues in the OTN Routing and Signaling drafts, is there any reason
>> why we need to wait until the next IETF meeting to initiate a Last
>> Call on them?  As has been pointed out many times, a WG's work is
>> done on its mailing list and not in its face-to-face meetings.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> John  
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>