Re: [CCAMP] Question on draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 20 August 2013 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4A611E8142 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.232
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.232 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UM7AU7TxvOXw for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9799211E8130 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25727 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2013 20:12:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2013 20:12:20 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=FD3bxu3yMNdgHGXgewNd1JiINSdR0UsVfihp/TP60gc=; b=kO68H802lVBjiIQ7jxIyumGKudYh3QjPcOX4C284ICxM0MUedy2LC9LVcLvNpZbvexIZOCUl6m7UEO/3YhNb0kx9PffohyDD1kQhUQTnXr6vZ3OQsPf4IdND+9eGOE9L;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:60367 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1VBsHs-0000GO-H5; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:12:20 -0600
Message-ID: <5213CDA3.7020503@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:12:19 -0400
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <00fd01ce9dd4$5a604810$0f20d830$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00fd01ce9dd4$5a604810$0f20d830$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update.all@tools.ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Question on draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:12:48 -0000

Adrian,
	I think this is correct.  Good catch.

Lou
(document co-author)

On 08/20/2013 02:37 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hello authors of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update,
> 
> I'm reviewing your document in response to the publication request. It looks
> quite straight-forward, but I have an early question.
> 
> In this document you are deprecating PSC-2, PSC-3, and PSC-4.
> 
> I believe that the IANA action will cause IANA to update the GMPLS-TC-MIB at
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib/ianagmplstc-mib
> 
> Just wanted to check that you are OK with this. If you are, we will add a note
> to the IANA considerations section to make sure they catch this.
> 
> (No need for document changes at this point - my complete review will come
> later.)
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>