Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Wed, 06 February 2013 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3337321F8915 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:27:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gopaRi2cBpHy for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBF021F88AE for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:27:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AOE81759; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:27:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:26:53 +0000
Received: from SZXEML417-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.156) by lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:27:46 +0000
Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.16]) by szxeml417-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.156]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:27:43 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding
Thread-Index: AQHOAJZIlM0EpcpCsEW1cJUYjOCmwZhlxtjggANpjYCAAbfq8P//5DMAgAFEUHA=
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 01:27:41 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83585B7F5@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <5105E684.4030607@labn.net> <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B35B5B@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48073D01@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se> <5106DED0.3090008@labn.net> <510BE822.6010609@labn.net> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83585AA40@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <510FB807.80805@labn.net> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83585B3CE@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <511111BC.4090605@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <511111BC.4090605@labn.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.72.159]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on ODUFlex-related encoding
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 01:27:49 -0000

Hi Lou,

Your format is correct.



Best Regards

Fatai


> Note that if it needs IEEE float number for ODUflex(GFP), I will
> remove "N" field (ie., to crank back to version 05).
> 

Given that the topic of N is closed (consensus is not to use it) I take
it your proposal is:

      0                   1                   2                   3
      0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |  Signal Type  |                   Reserved                    |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |              NVC              |        Multiplier (MT)        |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
     |                            Bit_Rate                           |
     +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

Is this correct?

Thanks,
Lou

> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Fatai
>>