Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02

Hi Lou, 

The proposal is reasonable, I agree.

Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Cyril Margaria

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:47 PM
> To: Margaria, Cyril (NSN - DE/Munich); dirk.schroetter@nutsix.de;
> Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti); Steve.Balls@metaswitch.com;
> Ben.Wright@metaswitch.com
> Cc: CCAMP
> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-
> attribute-ero-02
> 
> Authors, WG,
> 	It seems that Dirk is no longer active in our WG or on the draft.
> We'd like to propose the following in order to unblock progress on this
> draft:
> 
> 1) That Dirk's name be removed from the Authors/Contributor's section
> 
> 2) That Dirk's contribution to this draft to date be recognized in the
>    Acknowledgments section
> 
> 3) That these changes be made in
>    draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-03
> 
> 4) That draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-03 then be accepted as
>    a WG document based the results of last month's poll
>    (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg14293.html)
> 
> 5) That, baring any substantive objections, that the above take place
>    on or after Jan 31.
> 
> We can revisit 1 & 2 if Dirk responds to the IPR poll in future.
> 
> Thoughts/comments?
> 
> Lou (and Deborah)
> 
> On 1/14/2013 12:05 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> > Dirk,
> > 	Please respond so that we can move this draft forward.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Lou
> >
> > PS CCAMP, if anyone knows how to contact Dirk please forward this
> > message to him, or let us know who to reach him.
> >
> > On 12/4/2012 6:00 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
> >> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
> >>
> >> As part of the preparation for the poll on making this document a WG
> >> document:
> >>
> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
> >> draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02?
> >>
> >>   Please state either:
> >>
> >>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>   or
> >>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
> >>
> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> >> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
> >>
> >>    If yes to the above, please state either:
> >>
> >>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR
> rules"
> >>   or
> >>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
> >>
> >>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> >>   appropriate.
> >>
> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
> >> the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not
> >> you are aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance
> to
> >> the next stage until a response has been received from each author
> >> and listed contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN
> >> THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
> >>
> >> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an
> author
> >> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR
> >> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of
> IPR
> >> of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating
> >> in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.
> >> For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> >>
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> CCAMP WG Chairs
> >>
> >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> >> response.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> CCAMP mailing list
> >> CCAMP@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > CCAMP mailing list
> > CCAMP@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> >
> >
> >
> >