[CCAMP] ODUflex error in RFC7139 (3924)

Fred Gruman <fgruman@gmail.com> Sun, 23 March 2014 13:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fgruman@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B011A0988 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.099
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e03m8MGdTLop for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-x232.google.com (mail-oa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625C41A097A for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id i7so4633562oag.23 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Mb2+mk7b7Mgn0xE/K9kB59HCtNJO87sKl/7Xl+I3c8M=; b=Nk9BQes03KREWMoPhqUYOz661575o5bV7/Vwn5xTh5JHIXWGBPloPjYyiCPMZOK6Fj Ew8HsQJ67Bbj5UH0xtTcG/yh9FeiVn+uP3vAvNs23ZmLll6nrZd119owMEODxBhN2Plb TTG24m7Rr5dD+ccSgqbBsQUDlzBZn8e0qbNmeN0UwnMwY8ne+IPIe4cYiLlkzK/AT27/ 4yGiFeH+IxtmeDdg/NDS01BZecypEjmz3J2RNAOPImJtQlxN5HO69mk5UP0yFb+9lOk4 OTv4WCo9weFTp9Ug9UjSE3YMH13KUUuq2cTgNz/F/Q2wa65HW1znoXhqKLikO6rycme5 jGzQ==
X-Received: by 10.60.159.137 with SMTP id xc9mr52322547oeb.31.1395582506904; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from telorast.home (pool-96-226-149-129.dllstx.fios.verizon.net. [96.226.149.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cz10sm47134394oec.10.2014.03.23.06.48.25 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 06:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Fred Gruman <fgruman@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CADA265@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 08:48:23 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3FC9FA3-2FF3-451B-98AB-1E6DF9F8F876@gmail.com>
References: <20140321030515.3EF087FC387@rfc-editor.org> <0a6b01cf45dc$60228370$20678a50$@olddog.co.uk> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CADA265@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
To: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/p1GSklRkWIlTZ8x7pDeFteWGY-0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] ODUflex error in RFC7139 (3924)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 13:48:28 -0000

Hi Fatai,

I believe there is an error in RFC 7139 regarding the ITU-T definitions regarding ODUflex(CBR) in Table 1.

Table 1 lists the minimum, nominal and maximum values for the TS.  But the left column is wrong.  Per G.709 (Table 7-7) these values should be listed as ODTUk.ts (ODTU2.ts, ODTU3.ts, ODTU4.ts).  Note that the formulas in this section are written correctly (e.g., refers to ODTUk.ts)

Table 2 for ODUflex(GFP) is correctly referring to ODUk.ts, but I wanted to point out the the values for ODUk.ts are different than ODTUk.ts used for ODUflex(CBR). ODUk.ts is given in G.709 Table 7-8.  You may want to explicitly show the ODUk.ts values to be consistent with ODUflex(CBR), although this update is not absolutely necessary as the text is correct.

Fred