IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-meuric-ccamp-tsvmode-signaling-04

julien.meuric@orange.com Tue, 23 April 2024 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452D3C14F6FB for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cw8KWiZ-dHGz for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.orange.com (smtp-out.orange.com [80.12.210.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CD9DC14F704 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; i=@orange.com; q=dns/txt; s=orange002; t=1713865271; x=1745401271; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:cc: in-reply-to:from; bh=B1AQy81vmNyVv5mmcG3x91jUxaaOJOmGU0dlpq1ezEc=; b=jRpHUzXH7cXEts3JLAJ20kVB97wK6F99HlFoTMF2CabNhVazsE7QyPMV LeXVW/HMvtb2CHkdrvWdG2uSBcUWNjwd7D5oKmRTkU3CZc6Jvf6z311wU DkhgJsq415GHV7I4JsiEpnsHY1pYtVfqkrrlimCmUFqsiE1qlFp7P3u6b T6lzu6pBL7QBe6i3fz6quckYYdgYexqRWvj0GeHmyr2A6j3A7wI3gAX2L B032dls+JfVUybInI5GbKcxl5OX8nyVZ/IoHlx0oQ1u+6dmq7hbKFtab/ 2fLhq+Rn7Jl/4RM33k65KutN1cxvA7rOGPSdYDU4QnLQVr8lzIF1Yxqgr Q==;
Received: from unknown (HELO opfedv1rlp0e.nor.fr.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by smtp-out.orange.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Apr 2024 11:41:09 +0200
Received: from unknown (HELO OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by opfedv1rlp0e.nor.fr.ftgroup with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 23 Apr 2024 11:41:09 +0200
Received: from [x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x] by OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup [x.x.x.x] with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.37; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:41:08 +0200
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708383600"; d="p7s'346?scan'346,208,217,346";a="132376643"
Message-ID: <9aef73c6-4916-4bd5-abc0-39aee389a4c4@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:40:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Italo Busi <italo.busi@huawei.com>
References: <00d201da8cee$6f8d3080$4ea79180$@gmail.com> <1fdbc772497543abb7b8f685c133d4da@huawei.com>
Content-Language: en-US, fr
Organization: Orange
CC: ccamp@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <1fdbc772497543abb7b8f685c133d4da@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090009070902040704020409"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.26.53]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX108.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.5) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pPDHc71Un-9rZAv4YDCPVX1u-Sk>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG adoption poll on draft-meuric-ccamp-tsvmode-signaling-04
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 09:41:16 -0000

Ciao Italo,

Thank you for your support.

So far, the scope of the document is rather end-do-end OCh LSPs. It's 
not clear to me what you have in mind when mentioning "LSP segments", 
but no use case is precluded at this stage. If you believe there are 
missing pieces (e.g., in case of regeneration along the path), we'd be 
happy to work with you in the refinement of the I-D once it's adopted. :-)

Cheers,

Julien


On 22/04/2024 14:27, Italo Busi wrote:
>
> Yes/support
>
> I have one question/doubt which can also be addressed through normal 
> WG process after adoption
>
> Is the solution provided in this draft applicable only to end-to-end 
> LSPs or could it be also used with LSP segments?
>
> Thanks, Italo
>
> *From:*daniele.ietf@gmail.com <daniele.ietf@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* venerdì 12 aprile 2024 17:31
>
> Working group,
>
> IPR declaration collection completed.
>
> This starts the polling for the adoption of 
> draft-meuric-ccamp-tsvmode-signaling-04 by CCAMP. The poll will last 2 
> weeks and will end on *Friday - April 26^th .*
>
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not 
> support" and a motivation for your reply, mandatory for the "not 
> support" and nice to have for the "support".
>
> Thanks
>
> Daniele, Luis, Fatai
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status