[CCAMP] Request for a "Designated Expert" to carve "OTN Signal Type" subregistry

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Sun, 09 November 2014 02:13 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C331A0147 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 18:13:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zit1QD5Y9fLH for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 18:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404561A013B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 18:13:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3498; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415499182; x=1416708782; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=wE/ORqF9Z3iVIXxj6iZpB1bmwozas7zemGcirSRu32w=; b=imgEGnSXPdOxgKpSH3rkz1uPZhaY04uBILUi7oyf9AJjfXeIqHzoxdTK 6+Qz8Dqk1NUmCd5WXjepIJaGsi6IeFk4phcdUhKQXzqa5mmqiMCCwM/L9 dg39fudotblSZa6GfFtzi3lJhMLWbGZFjhAuwTnba/OohiRotW5l8GbsQ Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhcFAD/NXlStJV2d/2dsb2JhbABbgkhGVFoDyXSBcIdNgRYWAQEBAQF9hAlrDhIBDHQnBAENiEYNzQwBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBARuRFYRSBZIxhFOHIYE0PYMSkV2DeoI0gQMBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,343,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217";a="370918250"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2014 02:12:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA92CZ0n027755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 9 Nov 2014 02:12:35 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.140]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 20:12:35 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: Request for a "Designated Expert" to carve "OTN Signal Type" subregistry
Thread-Index: AQHP+8KgYRSfIOgpZ0y49ZwK8vQ/QQ==
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 02:12:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D08438DE.D714B%zali@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.255.164]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D08438DED714Bzaliciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/pwaX50LzfAj6IPCEBe9xuhzAVFQ
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Request for a "Designated Expert" to carve "OTN Signal Type" subregistry
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 02:13:02 -0000

Hi Lou, Deborah, Adrian, and all:

This is with regard to the recently adapted draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-00 (was: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ali-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-02).


As you know, the "OTN Signal Type" subregistry is currently defined to use the Standards Action registration policy as defined by [RFC5226<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5226>]. draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-signal-type-subregistry-00 directs that both Standards Action and Specification Required policies be applied to this subregistry.


In the light of the above, can you please help us get a Designated Expert to review and carve "OTN Signal Type" subregistry?

Thanks

Regards … Zafar