Re: [CCAMP] Input on publication track of WSON solutions documents

Dirk Schroetter <Dirk.Schroetter@nutsix.de> Wed, 03 October 2012 07:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Dirk.Schroetter@nutsix.de>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0B21F865B for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 00:49:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iqAickYS9ZlI for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 00:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sgritter.de (mail.sgritter.de [84.38.67.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7381021F8658 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 00:49:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.26] (p4FFE0416.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.254.4.22]) by mail.sgritter.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9FE5023A357; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:49:18 +0200 (CEST)
References: <506AFA9B.2000508@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <506AFA9B.2000508@labn.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <B27435DC-27A0-4617-A9BF-3CD9C42DED26@nutsix.de>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Dirk Schroetter <Dirk.Schroetter@nutsix.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:49:23 +0200
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Input on publication track of WSON solutions documents
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 07:49:25 -0000

Lou,

I do support option a.

BR

/Dirk

Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse any spelling errors.

Am 02.10.2012 um 16:30 schrieb Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>et>:

> CCAMP,
> 
> The WG has several WSON-related drafts including:
>   1. draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode
>   2. draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te
>   3. draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode
>   4. draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signal-compatibility-ospf    
>   5. draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling
> 
> These drafts are currently identified as being on the Standards
> Track.  The WG typically requests Standards Track publication of
> documents that fill/fix a clear protocol function and/or have
> strong WG support. Given the scope of this work as well as the
> time the drafts have been active in the WG, we'd like to solicit
> the WG's input on the publication track to be requested.
> 
> Once the WG reaches consensus on these drafts (as indicated by a
> *future* WG last call), Standards Track publication can be
> requested or these drafts could also be published via a
> non-Standards Track, see section 4.2 of RFC2026 for all options.
> 
> Please let us know (preferably by responding on the WG list) if you:
> 
> a. Support targeting all of these documents for Standards Track
>   publication?
>  [yes/no]
> 
> b. If no, support targeting some of these documents for Standards
>   Track publication?
>  [1, yes/no
>   2, yes/no
>   3, yes/no
>   4, yes/no
>   5, yes/no]
> 
> c. If no to any of the above, which status do you think appropriate?
>  [Experimental or Informational]
> 
> d. Finally, we are most interested in hearing from anyone who has,
>   or is planning an implementation based on the WG drafts.  We
>   understand that some may not want this information published,
>   so please let any of the chairs and/or ADs know (Lou,
>   Deborah, Adrian or Stewart), and they will publish the
>   information without any personal or company identification.
> 
> Keep in mind that this mail is *not* starting a WG last call on
> any of the documents identified above.  We'd like input on
> intended publication status prior to any last call discussion.
> 
> Lou and Deborah
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
>