[CCAMP] layer0-types open issue created: References to L0 data plane standards should be ITU-T Recommendations

Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@nokia.com> Fri, 27 December 2019 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dieter.beller@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9BA120236 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 04:35:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xRyEhsI9q3c for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 04:35:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am5eur02on0722.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe07::722]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A50D1200FF for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 04:35:00 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jfh9AgTSSy/PYgTrYWUbHbZ4kbuvCls9mvbvsvmoapblVn4jw5oCUwh1ckSHTsgcGBAOI+lcZwWT1IXFQQRtUD+MUDPzr6uAvxZfhB8OjWebMxLnYGWOjBTTiHLTkX/XfQ8WoG/fn965mmXrEnXCUNQ2yI/Z1XxGkrb/fDCDp4Ye7UehbHi17IuqQSBIKn6Qzrn2lrPacVB4MUr3wWqlK++Ikqf8qPwLuA5jCAVWHOn38vg7k2EURFMWpzKFolW6q32HZl5+7oJjDhIV32eVEPW9DpP9axbUTuPPLlIp0sUXLsVm1hVC0NatooYQv6mGWkhyN3D6TTyjUfOnpGWh3Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c8C3YSiQ26ibfK6vUgY531x0JHCYnnZgwhzWXmzbwmI=; b=DBtw4agcvqZcIKV58h6jWM/4CLk0CvSUbUStVQBnOAy0p03OykrE2elvjECKV4mTrOa3378lWeqIW1stCa6sA7epM/rs9qS996D23ej3MV4g9TLknGDPoHQOr4SPoZ/05wtORptbORL3KFy1vvDjikkFiBxktGTRWz8Uqcjw6DmOV0XceOHMMoKSuzMTIiIAPxl9CPEUbH+12KIYDenk9U7849mIG9SkL+48ahMdl8WjkWG0bYdEyve061Lv8G1Gh2PMxv5koBp6YRT1Xn8pYSYhfdaVLLrZdyEX1WgV0sj3/402YujGGFHb1gMeL7fvw3uaxcuygkbUoT96XtLblA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c8C3YSiQ26ibfK6vUgY531x0JHCYnnZgwhzWXmzbwmI=; b=qRinRrluAAWpxXDVm+r7nK+aKvp++QROiksU9674RH7zbldCUFJO3qk5WHizcl47ekNHHy3kqR6GHMTX/LpRQXWYMFUwKpewOO2PGea51ZTMcVgk6hgxfpNQjXfM9wnfUKMSVRzIE9CtSREGOcu+qf2b5UZElPHC9ONI6UoBMvo=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dieter.beller@nokia.com;
Received: from DB7PR07MB6042.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.178.107.151) by DB7PR07MB3946.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.100.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2602.8; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:34:57 +0000
Received: from DB7PR07MB6042.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1874:6864:b3ae:d0c1]) by DB7PR07MB6042.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::1874:6864:b3ae:d0c1%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2602.006; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:34:57 +0000
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
From: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia
Message-ID: <5082528b-1240-622f-f5fe-f58e3154e38a@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 13:34:53 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------6C32B2A0A758F29FA0AA1412"
Content-Language: en-US
X-ClientProxiedBy: HE1PR0102CA0065.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:7:7d::42) To DB7PR07MB6042.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:8e::23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [172.30.9.7] (131.228.32.167) by HE1PR0102CA0065.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (2603:10a6:7:7d::42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2581.11 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:34:56 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [131.228.32.167]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-HT: Tenant
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 87ce0903-7152-45a9-d511-08d78ac92eb9
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: DB7PR07MB3946:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <DB7PR07MB39463A8081DB5F496F6796D1E22A0@DB7PR07MB3946.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0264FEA5C3
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(136003)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(53754006)(31686004)(6486002)(81166006)(8676002)(5660300002)(4326008)(81156014)(316002)(8936002)(54906003)(16576012)(6916009)(31696002)(36756003)(956004)(2616005)(33964004)(86362001)(36916002)(52116002)(2906002)(26005)(966005)(478600001)(16526019)(186003)(66476007)(66946007)(66556008)(6666004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB7PR07MB3946; H:DB7PR07MB6042.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 87ce0903-7152-45a9-d511-08d78ac92eb9
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Dec 2019 12:34:57.5463 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: yQ9KQEPcPrx3KV7p+FOvoPmqo0CfGD6oBZAq0MzU5FPV7ZzBUrnjE6Bg7JZ7GAyTDGfN68afoA61BajXkd2efg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB7PR07MB3946
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/q8Gw9E6YG18EANLvTXxhrW_hhUg>
Subject: [CCAMP] layer0-types open issue created: References to L0 data plane standards should be ITU-T Recommendations
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 12:35:04 -0000

Hi all,

at the IETF 106 CCAMP session, Deborah commented on 
draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang-02 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang/> 
that references to ITU-T Recommendations
defining the layer 0 data plane shall be added wherever meaningful. IMO, 
these comments also apply to layer0-types. Therefore, I created the open 
issue
on the CCAMP GitHub regarding layer0-types with the following description:

"There are many L0 data plane references in layer0-types to IETF RFCs. 
The standards, however, defining the L0 data plane are usually ITU-T 
Recommendations.
Example: the flex DWDM grid is defined in ITU-T Recommendation G.694.1. 
References should point directly to the standard defining the entity as 
opposed to
an IETF RFC that in turn points to the related ITU-T Recommendation."

See: https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types/issues/4


Thanks,
Dieter