[CCAMP]Re: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-18: (with COMMENT)

[Italo Busi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Paul,

Thank you for the review, the authors have updated the document to address your comments and posted the updated document as draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-19

See our feedbacks in line, marked as [Authors]

Thanks for the support and review. 

Authors, Haomian and Italo.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Sent: lunedì 29 aprile 2024 14:54
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-18:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang-18: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-
> ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> some nits:
> 
>      Registrant Contact: The IESG
> 
> Should that not be The IETF ?
> 

[Authors] The text, mentioning the IESG as the registrant contact, is written following the guidelines in section 5 of RFC8407 which seems to be a common practice in other RFCs

> The Contributors section has affiliation and email addresses. We normally do
> not add affiliations to Acknowledgements. Is there a specific reason for these?
> 
> 

[Authors] We have reformatted Acknowledgements and Contributors sections to follow the guidelines in RFC7322