[CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09

Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Thu, 15 November 2012 01:22 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C48821F8646 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:22:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.334
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.334 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.054, BAYES_50=0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WWsg1dg8G5ky for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:22:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB8421F84F1 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:22:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ALN60817; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:22:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML404-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:22:02 +0000
Received: from SZXEML455-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:22:15 +0800
Received: from SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com ([]) by SZXEML455-HUB.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:22:13 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
To: "huubatwork@gmail.com" <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: =?gb2312?B?W0NDQU1QXSC08Li0OiC08Li0OiAgV0cgTGFzdCBDYWxsIGNvbW1lbnRzIG9u?= =?gb2312?Q?_draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09?=
Thread-Index: AQHNwk05GLLOF87XGUutxysUhtq91JfqGPwA
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:22:12 +0000
Message-ID: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF835830007@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <50733BED.8090304@labn.net> <5081DCC1.60202@labn.net> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83582F514@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <50A25171.9060709@labn.net> <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF83582FB55@SZXEML552-MBX.china.huawei.com> <50A368EC.3050508@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50A368EC.3050508@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] =?gb2312?b?tPC4tDogILTwuLQ6ILTwuLQ6ICBXRyBMYXN0IENhbGwg?= =?gb2312?b?Y29tbWVudHMgb24gZHJhZnQtaWV0Zi1jY2FtcC1nbXBscy1nNzA5LWZyYW1l?= =?gb2312?b?d29yay0wOQ==?=
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:22:19 -0000

Hi Huub,


I just checked and we may need to use [G709-V4] to replace [G709-V3] and [G709-V3A2]. 

Best Regards


发件人: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:huubatwork@gmail.com] 
发送时间: 2012年11月14日 17:48
收件人: Fatai Zhang
抄送: Lou Berger; draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework@tools.ietf.org; CCAMP
主题: Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09

Hello Fatai,

(only focusing  on the reference)

You wrote:

> Regarding [G709-v1] reference, there is only general reference to
> [G709-v1] and [G709-v1a1], ie., no specific text is referenced from
> some specific place of these two documents, so we reused the
> same approach used by [RFC4328], otherwise, [G709-v1] and
> [G709-v1a1] should be used together to replace the alone
> [G709-v1] (because it is really difficult to differentiate either
> [G709-v1] or [G709-v1a1] should be referenced).
> Here is the referenced used by [RFC4328]:
> [ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network 
> (OTN)," G.709 Recommendation (and Amendment 1), February
> 2001 (October 2001).

Please note that the current in-force version of G.709 is from
February 2012, it includes all previous amendments, no need
to reference them separately.
Also G.709 has an additional Y.1331 number, so the reference
can be:

[ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network
(OTN)," G.709/Y.1331 Recommendation, February 2012.

Regards, Huub.