[CCAMP] 答复: 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09

[Fatai Zhang <[e-mail]>]

Hi Huub,

Thanks.

I just checked and we may need to use [G709-V4] to replace [G709-V3] and [G709-V3A2]. 



Best Regards

Fatai


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Huub van Helvoort [mailto:[e-mail]] 
发送时间: 2012年11月14日 17:48
收件人: Fatai Zhang
抄送: Lou Berger; [e-mail]; CCAMP
主题: Re: [CCAMP] 答复: 答复: WG Last Call comments on draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-09

Hello Fatai,

(only focusing  on the reference)

You wrote:

> Regarding [G709-v1] reference, there is only general reference to
> [G709-v1] and [G709-v1a1], ie., no specific text is referenced from
> some specific place of these two documents, so we reused the
> same approach used by [RFC4328], otherwise, [G709-v1] and
> [G709-v1a1] should be used together to replace the alone
> [G709-v1] (because it is really difficult to differentiate either
> [G709-v1] or [G709-v1a1] should be referenced).
> 
> Here is the referenced used by [RFC4328]:
> [ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network 
> (OTN)," G.709 Recommendation (and Amendment 1), February
> 2001 (October 2001).

Please note that the current in-force version of G.709 is from
February 2012, it includes all previous amendments, no need
to reference them separately.
Also G.709 has an additional Y.1331 number, so the reference
can be:

[ITUT-G709] ITU-T, "Interface for the Optical Transport Network
(OTN)," G.709/Y.1331 Recommendation, February 2012.

Regards, Huub.



-- 
*****************************************************************
              请记住，你是独一无二的，就像其他每一个人一样