[CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com> Thu, 30 October 2014 01:18 UTC

Return-Path: <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8051AC407 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.078
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlRiQgmeid7x for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68EA01ACEEA for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 18:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLB88110; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.36) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:40 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.19]) by SZXEMA404-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 09:18:34 +0800
From: Zhenghaomian <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
Thread-Index: AQHP86/kzMN7O5TNOEG+D7yOgfk3qJxH1fHQ
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:32 +0000
Message-ID: <E0C26CAA2504C84093A49B2CAC3261A438C2B13B@SZXEMA504-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <54514226.6050502@labn.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.53.113]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/rWoPrKuPJQXL9iaa1s-zp86I6MM
Subject: [CCAMP] 答复: Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 01:18:47 -0000

Hi, CCAMPers,

1) Yes, I think one such document is necessary, to cover the restoration problem, especially the one with resource sharing, with the existing mechanism (basically RSVP-TE, may have other options); 
2) Yes, as an individual author, I would like to work with experts in CCAMP to contribute technical discussions and text; 
3) Yes/Support. 

BTW, I would like to say it is really an 'informational' poll, a lot of information required:)

Best wishes,
Haomian



-----邮件原件-----
发件人: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger
发送时间: 2014年10月30日 3:38
收件人: CCAMP
主题: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a WG document

All,

This is start of a three week poll on making
draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-03 a CCAMP working group document.  The poll duration is extended due to the upcoming meeting.

This is a bit of an atypical adoption call.  We, the chairs, think this document requires work, but that it has reached the point that changes should be directed by the WG.  Recall that the individual authors have already merged this document with draft-gandhi-ccamp-gmpls-restoration-lsp.  Our questions to the WG are:

1) Do you think the WG should develop an informational document
   explaining how resource sharing works with the existing RSVP-TE
   RFCs/mechanisms?

   Please answer: "yes" or "no", elaborate if you wish.

2) Are you willing to contribute to this work, and if so how?

   Please answer: "no", "reviewer", "contribute text", or
   something else.

3) If you answered yes to #1, do support adoption of this document
   as the basis for the topic?

   Please answer: "yes/support" or "no/do not support".

   If indicating no, please state your objections to the document,
   keeping in mind that we expect the document to be revised as it
   works its way through wg process.  Either way, also please feel
   free to identify changes you'd like to see made post WG adoption.

   Note, objections to the topic are covered under question 1.

The poll ends Wednesday, November 19th.

Thanks,

Deborah and Lou

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp