Return-Path: X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A811A0339 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.851 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kd26CTcQSvI7 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:32:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41AAD1A0337 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 00:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BKA00574; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:32:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.38) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 08:32:31 +0100 Received: from SZXEMA512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.13]) by SZXEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:32:25 +0800 From: "Zhangxian (Xian)" To: "ccamp@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: Status of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-00 and draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-00 Thread-Index: Ac+fNcD/UKVKetoPT0CJgg49LTlYwA== Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:32:24 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.66.104.209] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B470F5E59SZXEMA512MBSchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/rcWJSwQBrr4ekQIfuF0Rn3mCYq4 Cc: "draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext@tools.ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext@tools.ietf.org" Subject: [CCAMP] Status of draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-00 and draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-00 X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 07:32:41 -0000 --_000_C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B470F5E59SZXEMA512MBSchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, CCAMPers, We do not plan to present the following two drafts, which are recently adop= ted as WG drafts. A brief summary of the (potential) open issues pertaining= to these drafts are provided below: 1) draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-00 Open issue: there are discussions in the list about supporting concatenatio= n of multiple frequency slots, which might require update to this draft. We= will follow the framework or label draft update once it is more stable and= provide a solution accordingly. 2) draft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-00 Open issue: update the "Max Width" from 8-bit to 16-bit in Port Label R= estriction sub-TLV (confirmed and will be updated in the next version) Using this chance, I would like to request your review of these two drafts.= If you have any further comments, please send the list or us, so we can al= so address them together in the next version. Regards, Xian (on behalf of all authors and contributors) --_000_C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B470F5E59SZXEMA512MBSchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi, CCAMPers,

 

We= do not plan to present the following two drafts, which are recently adopte= d as WG drafts. A brief summary of the (potential) open issues pertaining t= o these drafts are provided below:

 

1= )   &= nbsp;  d= raft-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-rsvp-te-ext-00

Op= en issue: there are discussions in the list about supporting concatenation = of multiple frequency slots, which might require update to this draft. We w= ill follow the framework or label draft update once it is more stable and provide a solution accordingly.

 

2= )   &= nbsp;  draf= t-ietf-ccamp-flexible-grid-ospf-ext-00=

    Open issue: = update the “Max Width” from 8-bit to 16-bit in Port Label Restriction sub-TLV (confirmed and w= ill be updated in the next version)

 

Us= ing this chance, I would like to request your review of these two drafts. I= f you have any further comments, please send the list or us, so we can also= address them together in the next version.

 

Re= gards,

Xi= an (on behalf of all authors and contributors)

--_000_C636AF2FA540124E9B9ACB5A6BECCE6B470F5E59SZXEMA512MBSchi_--