Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Mon, 17 December 2012 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4375821F8BD7 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:53:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ehc+40RNs+DK for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:53:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9021F8BCC for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 09:53:02 -0800 (PST)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from stew-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBHHqw4c027302 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:52:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.61.102.37] (dhcp-10-61-102-37.cisco.com [10.61.102.37]) by stew-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBHHqqiS010208; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:52:52 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <50CF5BF4.9080008@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:52:52 +0100
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
References: <50BE8093.7090800@labn.net> <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B001CF@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B001CF@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 10:00:51 -0800
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, Rudiger Kunze <ruediger.kunze@telekom.de>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:53:05 -0000

Lou,

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
No, the IPR is still being documented.

Cheers,
Clarence

On 15/12/2012 16:09, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
> Hi Lou, et al-
>
> Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
> No, the IPR has not been disclosed but it's a work in progress.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards...Zafar
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 6:01 PM
>> To: Zafar Ali (zali); George Swallow (swallow); Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil); Matt Hartley (mhartley);
>> Kenji Kumaki; Rudiger Kunze; CCAMP
>> Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03
>>
>> Authors, Contributors, (CCAMP)
>>
>> As part of the preparation for the poll on making this document a WG
>> document:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03?
>>
>>    Please state either:
>>
>>    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>    or
>>    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879,
>> 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>>     If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>    or
>>    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>>    If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>    appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to
>> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not
>> advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO
>> LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind
>> you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you
>> are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
>> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more information, please see the
>> RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> CCAMP WG Chairs
>>
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.
>
>
>