Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt

Pontus Sköldström <Pontus.Skoldstrom@acreo.se> Thu, 18 October 2012 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Pontus.Skoldstrom@acreo.se>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0766521F847F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pcjLokR+iQkJ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta1a-out-s8.mail.zscaler.net (mta1a-out-s8.mail.zscaler.net [216.218.133.242]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190DF21F845D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acreo.se ([217.151.195.216]) by mta1a.mail.zscaler.net ([216.218.133.196]) with ESMTP id 5080461A10BF000E; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:10:34 -0700
Received: from acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se ([10.4.148.12]) by acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se ([10.4.148.12]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:10:31 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pontus_Sk=F6ldstr=F6m?= <Pontus.Skoldstrom@acreo.se>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:10:29 +0200
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
Thread-Index: Ac2tM7aUIg/f7ldUQKuGA24xaPf5qwAJ79xg
Message-ID: <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0AAAF64E@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se>
References: <20121007182354.19033.17145.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5072FEC1.7020108@labn.net> <59AB558A089035438998A3EE6321ACBEAF72@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>, <5077174E.8000407@labn.net> <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0A886805@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se>, <507EF751.109@labn.net> <5F606CA13780E9419D0CFFE732DDACE12D0A88680B@acreoexc01.ad.acreo.se> <508002B3.9050100@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <508002B3.9050100@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: sv-SE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Zscaler: score=0 iprep=0
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-mpls-tp-oam-ext-09.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 18:10:42 -0000

See inline, 

Cheers, 
Pontus 
--- snip --- 
> Just noticed, the draft says:
>    3.4.2.  MPLS OAM PM Delay sub-TLV
> 
>    The "MPLS OAM PM Delay sub-TLV" depicted below is carried as a sub-
>    TLV of the "OAM Functions TLV".
> 
> Shouldn't it read:
>    TLV of the "Performance Monitoring sub-TLV"
> 
> and (in same section)
>    define, suggested value 1).
> should be
>    define, suggested value 2).

[Pontus] 
You're absolutely correct, fixed. 

--- snip --- 
> > We'd rather not specify exactly what happens when the threshold is
> > exceeded but leave that open (could be that nothing happens). And
> > since we're not talking about any particular thing in RFC6374 there's
> > no reference to it.
> 
> Perhaps the way to address is to make a general statement on this
> earlier in the section and removed both statements of:
> 
>    Configuration of triggered action(s) is out of scope for this
>    document but may include signaling an NMS, triggering protection
>    switching, etc.
> 
> Perhaps something at the start of 3.4 that says something like:
> 
> The Performance Monitoring sub-TLV provides the configuration
> information mentioned in Section 7 of [RFC6374]. It includes support
> for
> the configuration of quality thresholds and, as described in [RFC6374],
> "the crossing of which will trigger warnings or alarms, and result
> reporting and exception notification will be integrated into the
> system-wide network management and reporting framework."

[Pontus] 
Sure, that makes sense, fixed.