[CCAMP] follow-up draft-helvoort.ccamp-fs-priority

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Wed, 31 July 2013 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E03C21F9F6F; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.384
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.384 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.215, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUvUgSYrXMWN; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE3E21F9F13; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so880575pbc.32 for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D9d5NFdatKiIbv/MtW7gpZqZDAL0qgmDp9rYmjwrHl0=; b=JXX+pSOlzoVsSlrJPjfOBsm9bQauALUvWUuZblADOmGWu6LHhB3C9BNkYXnjhGbd0x qbWq1ijC9vtgTK6f7QkPd9RsMWYEUBp65vzzKaDMeHJYLdHeU0vFS9ZfJbTCY3/kQKja wIlnFUgukzgSMdSldc0RqRjfZexQEf0ZQOPbEofvA+6zivdA9I5m1/m1J9Cyt7ZQNz9I m6jUh1bMi7+cm+4+5PTt+w5XfRFS0jKs15RLgrQeDdprAJoNv5UUXHvL5sQL6sbRQxok RcTE3lx/DA4WECpDAbq4K+nB/hnoQe3o1wROmskFvu0qTP3On3rSDHpIOfL3nq2rZCqG BAGw==
X-Received: by 10.66.142.42 with SMTP id rt10mr62624584pab.1.1375283263194; Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-175c.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-175c.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.23.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id eq5sm2692762pbc.15.2013.07.31.08.07.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Jul 2013 08:07:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51F9283C.6020204@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 17:07:40 +0200
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: [CCAMP] follow-up draft-helvoort.ccamp-fs-priority
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:07:44 -0000

All,

Following up on the discussion in the ccamp WG after the
presentation of draft-helvoort.ccamp-fs-priority where Lou
pointed out that RFC4427 does not define the actual order
of the priorities:

I discussed this with the interested parties and we reached the
conclusion that updates to PSC (draft-rhd-mpls-tp-psc-priority)
can be made without updating RFC4427.

Best regards, Huub.

-- 
*****************************************************************
               请记住,你是独一无二的,就像其他每一个人一样