[CCAMP] [Errata Verified] RFC4803 (3831)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 23 December 2013 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A11571AE097; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:03:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.44
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.44 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Gb0P6DGvMF8; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2607:f170:8000:1500::d3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA3D1AE08D; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id A8D897FC392; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:03:47 -0800 (PST)
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk, tnadeau@cisco.com, adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20131223140347.A8D897FC392@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 06:03:47 -0800
Cc: ccamp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] [Errata Verified] RFC4803 (3831)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:03:52 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC4803,
"Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR) Management Information Base". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4803&eid=3831

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Date Reported: 2013-12-12
Verified by: Stewart Bryant (IESG)

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------
   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000015,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000012,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }

   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x02,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000016,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000013,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }


Corrected Text
--------------
   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000015,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000012,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }

   In mplsXCTable:
   {
      mplsXCIndex                = 0x01,
      mplsXCInSegmentIndex       = 0x00000016,
      mplsXCOutSegmentIndex      = 0x00000013,
      mplsXCLspId                = 0x0102 -- unique ID
      mplsXCLabelStackIndex      = 0x00, -- only a single outgoing label
      mplsXCRowStatus            = createAndGo(4)
   }


Notes
-----
The entries in the mplsXCTable are indexed by {mplsXCIndex, mplsXCInSegmentIndex, mplsOutSegmentIndex}. All XC entries for the same LSP should share a common value of mplsXCIndex because mplsTunnelXCPointer can be set to point to the first entry and then all of the other entries can be found.

The error in the example in Section 6 is that it shows a different value of mplsXCIndex for the reverse direction cross-connects. It should be set to the same value as is used for the forward direction cross-connect.

--------------------------------------
RFC4803 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-lsr-mib-15)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Label Switching Router (LSR) Management Information Base
Publication Date    : February 2007
Author(s)           : T. Nadeau, Ed., A. Farrel, Ed.
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG