Re: [CCAMP] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: (with DISCUSS)

[Martin Bjorklund <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Adam Roach via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-08: Discuss
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> DISCUSS:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> §6:
> 
> >         If the type is given as an UUID or a string, it is interpreted
> >         as a W3C regular expression, which matches a resource of type
> >         'yang:uuid' or 'string' if the given regular expression
> >         matches the resource string.
> 
> This needs a citation for what is meant by "W3C regular expression." I'm making
> a wild guess that this refers to the regular expressions defined for use with
> XSD? If so, the reference is presumably this document:
> https://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/

You're right.  I have added a reference. In RFC 7950 we reference
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xmlschema-2-20041028, so perhaps we
should do that here as well (the idea is to use the same regexp as in
YANG).  But OTOH the regexp definition has not changed at all between
XSD 1.0 and 1.1, so perhaps it doesn't matter.



/martin