[CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 10 April 2019 23:31 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C761120046; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability@ietf.org, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, ccamp-chairs@ietf.org, daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <155493910930.22716.11857866602240872600.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:31:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/ucSdzUX83VC6AB6qQZnx-tq1Qb8>
Subject: [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:31:49 -0000
Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-bandwidth-availability/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Ben's DISCUSS as well. * In addition, I could not find any reference to the Extended Class-Type Error and the error value Class-Type mismatch even in the IANA registry at https://www.iana.org/assignments/rsvp-parameters/rsvp-parameters.xhtml Is this something you are defining in this document? If so, an entry in the IANA consideration section is warranted. * Section 7 The table seems to be off. Shouldn't this be? 400 99.99% 200 99.995% 100 99.999%
- [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-i… Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker
- Re: [CCAMP] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on dra… Yemin (Amy)