Re: [CCAMP] IPR polling on draft-esdih-ccamp-layer0-types-ext-01

[Dieter Beller <[e-mail]>]

Hi Daniele, Fatai, all,

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft


Thanks,
Dieter


On 07.07.2021 14:23, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, CCAMP,
>
> This is the IPR polling in preparation for the WG adoption of 
> draft-esdih-ccamp-layer0-types-ext-01.
>
> When we progressed the L0 types draft we reduced its scope to cover 
> just the spectrum aspects. That was needed to cover the impairment 
> free optical drafts.
>
> New drafts covering also impairment aspect of optical networks (e.g. 
> draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang)  need the L0 types 
> draft to be extended.
>
> This draft has been requested by the co-chairs to the authors and 
> hence we will run a quick (1 week) WG polling after the IPR one.
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> or
>
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>
> or
>
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
> appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor 
> please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of 
> whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the CCAMP WG email list but are not listed as an author 
> or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR 
> rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR 
> of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in 
> any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For 
> more information, please see the RFCs listed above and 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Daniele & Fatai
>