IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 19:09 UTC

Return-Path: <leeyoung@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DD711E8110 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6cVkL+0qSBVs for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395BD11E8257 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:09:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AZP70237; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:09:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:08:46 +0000
Received: from DFWEML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.132) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:09:04 +0000
Received: from dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.15.141]) by dfweml407-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.132]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:08:57 -0700
From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling
Thread-Index: AQHOvsRPNOeuDADDv0SQJTTbfFVtKZoMHdCAgAAYY9A=
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:08:57 +0000
Message-ID: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17291DCEF7@dfweml511-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <524AF9A9.3040006@labn.net> <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0EE587D6@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0EE587D6@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.192.11.126]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 19:09:17 -0000

Hi Giovanni,

I thought 64 bit field has been already assigned for the application codes in Section 4.2.1 as follows: 

"In case of ITU Application Code, the mapping between the string defining the application code and the 64 bits number implementing the optical interface class is given in the following sections."

Let me know if this is good enough. 

Thanks.
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2013 5:38 AM
To: Lou Berger
Cc: CCAMP
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling

Hi all,

On Oct 1, 2013, at 18:34 , Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-21
> (Standards Track)

We propose an encoding of ITU application codes on 64 bits of Optical Interface Class (Section 4.2), just wandering if we already had any ITU/Q6 feedback or we are just ok with proposed encoding.

I'm ok with the rest of LC documents

Cheers
G

_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
CCAMP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email