Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update

t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 23 August 2013 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D882811E819C for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K89CGJSp8z5G for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB0511E81BB for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.232) by CO1EHSOBE014.bigfish.com (10.243.66.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:54 +0000
Received: from mail1-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480DD8E019B; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.253.197; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DBXPRD0710HT003.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -16
X-BigFish: PS-16(zzbb2dI98dI9371I542I1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzz8275ch1de098h1033IL17326ah186068h8275bh8275dh1de097hz2dh2a8h5a9h839h947hd24hf0ah1177h1179h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah139eh13b6h1441h1504h1537h162dh1631h1758h17f1h184fh1898h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1e23h304l1d11m1155h)
Received: from mail1-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail1-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1377275932922066_12751; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.245]) by mail1-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFAB7E0188; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DBXPRD0710HT003.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.253.197) by CO1EHSMHS015.bigfish.com (10.243.66.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:52 +0000
Received: from AMXPRD0111HT001.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com (157.56.250.117) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.255.79.166) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.347.3; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:38:49 +0000
Message-ID: <00c201cea01f$25d269a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <00a501ce9e5d$017b7ba0$047272e0$@olddog.co.uk> <52153E45.1030505@labn.net> <025701ce9f5c$185bcc80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <521765CC.4030306@labn.net> <045f01cea00b$573700f0$05a502d0$@olddog.co.uk> <52177E05.3040509@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:37:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.250.117]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update.all@tools.ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:39:07 -0000

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lou Berger" <lberger@labn.net>
To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: "'t.petch'" <ietfc@btconnect.com>om>;
<draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update.all@tools.ietf.org>rg>; <ccamp@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 4:21 PM

> On 08/23/2013 10:16 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> > Really good catch, Tom.
> >
> > What Lou suggests looks the best way to handle it.
> >
>
> Great.  Look for the publication announcement in a few minutes.

Yes.

I would prefer that the Switching Types portion of the GMPLS Signaling
Parameters was handled in a comparable manner, as for example
http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml#ic
mp-parameters-types
does so that PSC-2 PSC-3 PSC-4 still appeared in the registry but with
'deprecated' alongside each of them.  Given the updated reference to
whatever RFC this I-D becomes, then it will be relatively easy to follow
that link and see what these deprecated entries once were so it is a
minor consideration.

Tom Petch

> Lou
>
> > A
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Lou Berger [mailto:lberger@labn.net]
> >> Sent: 23 August 2013 14:38
> >> To: t.petch; adrian@olddog.co.uk
> >> Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update.all@tools.ietf.org;
ccamp@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [CCAMP] AD review of draft-ietf-ccamp-swcaps-update
> >>
> >> Tom,
> >> See below.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>> On 8/21/2013 6:55 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please add a note to the IANA considerations section to request
an
> >>>>> update to
> >>>>>
> >>>
https://www.iana.org/assignments/ianagmplstc-mib/ianagmplstc-mib.xhtml
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Possibly you should refer to it as IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB rather than
> >>> through
> >>>>> the URL.
> >>>> The proposed text to be added to the end of the section is:
> >>>>
> >>>>    A parallel change to IANA-GMPLS-TC-MIB is also required. In
> >>>>    particular, under IANAGmplsSwitchingTypeTC a reference to this
> >>>>    document should be added as item 3. Also the following changes
> >>> should
> >>>>    be made to the related values:
> >>>>
> >>>>           deprecated(2),      -- Deprecated
> >>>>           deprecated(3),      -- Deprecated
> >>>>           deprecated(4),      -- Deprecated
> >>>
> >>> Mmmmm RFC4181 says
> >>>
> >>> "Therefore, labels of named numbers and named
> >>>   bits MUST NOT be changed when revising IETF MIB modules (except
to
> >>>   correct typographical errors), and they SHOULD NOT be changed
when
> >>>   revising enterprise MIB modules.
> >>> "
> >>>
> >>> so I do not think that you can do that.  Change of STATUS (which
applies
> >>> to the whole TC) yes, label no. (Don't you love SNMP?)
> >>>
> >>> Tom Petch
> >>>
> >>
> >> Looks like you're right.
> >>
> >> Perhaps the following is the "right" middle ground:
> >> Existing:
> >>                   psc2(2),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 2
> >>                   psc3(3),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 3
> >>                   psc4(4),      -- Packet-Switch-Capable 4
> >> Revised:
> >>                   psc2(2),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
> >>                   psc3(3),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
> >>                   psc4(4),      -- Deprecated [This.document]
> >>
> >> Adrian,
> >>
> >> Do you agree with the above?  This is a bit different than your
request.
> >>
> >> Much thanks,
> >> Lou
> >
> >
>
>