Re: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming

[Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian,

The drafts are in the editor queue, I think there is still some time to have minor changes. I'll check with the RFC-editor.

Cheers,
Daniele  

-----Original Message-----
From: Adrian Farrel <[e-mail]> 
Sent: den 3 februari 2021 13:12
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>; 'CCAMP' <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; 'tom petch' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming

Hi Daniele,

Per the recent exchange with Tom, this whole debate may have elapsed. If the WSON model is now considered to be "beyond edit" then it will go ahead using 'wson' and any battle to achieve consistency among prefixes used in CCAMP models is already lost.

So we should just find a better use of our time (like actually completing the model :-)

I tried to look at Italo's table, but I'm afraid that I go quite confused about which models the prefixes applied to. Possibly this is because I didn't open up any of the expired drafts.

Best,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>
Sent: 03 February 2021 09:12
To: [e-mail]; 'CCAMP' <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; 'tom petch' <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming

Hi Adrian,

Thanks for reviving this discussion.

Together with Italo we tried to propose a sync up with TEAS before Christmas but we didn't have a big success.

Italo tried again to bring this up a couple of weeks ago:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/4R6Bh4Pxo-DZJ6I4R918c1PwrMw/

I agree with you that we should limit the scope to CCAMP. What would be your proposal to fill Italo's table?

Cheers,
Daniele  

-----Original Message-----
From: CCAMP <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: den 2 februari 2021 19:26
To: 'CCAMP' <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; 'tom petch' <[e-mail]>
Subject: [CCAMP] Proposal for YANG model prefix naming

Proposal for YANG model prefix naming.

Radek and then Tom raised the issue of consistency in prefix naming based on the fact that the TE topology model uses 'tet' and the TE topology state model uses 'tet-s'

CCAMP is currently working on plenty of YANG models, so it might be worth stepping back and getting the prefixes consistent across all of our work.
I'm not sure this is the most important thing on our list, and perhaps it would be better to discuss the colour of the bike shed, but to make sure that we do this just once, here is my attempt.

My conclusion is that, although it would be nice to be consistent with using just a suffix of 't' to indicate 'topology', this becomes messy with some of the longer names, and it is clearer to always use 'topo' (leaving the TE topology model as the odd one out).

This proposal only extends to CCAMP YANG models, and I don't think this list can debate the wider scoping of prefixes, but I think it would extend well enough.

The list shows...
Draftname
Modelname (currentprefix)--->(proposedprefix)

draft-ietf-ccamp-client-signal-yang
ietf-eth-tran-service (ethtsvc)--->(etht-svc) ietf-eth-tran-types
(etht-types) --->(etht-types) ietf-trans-client-service (clntsvc)
--->(tclnt-svc) ietf-trans-client-svc-types (clntsvc-types)
--->(tclnt-svc-types)

draft-ietf-ccamp-dwdm-if-param-yang
ietf-ext-xponder-wdm-if (ietf-ext-xponder-wdm-if)--->(ext-xponder-wdm-if)

draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang
ietf-flexi-grid-topology (flexi-grid-topology) --->(flexi-grid-topo)

draft-ietf-ccamp-l1csm-yang
ietf-l1csm (l1csm) --->(l1csm)

draft-ietf-ccamp-layer0-types
ietf-layer0-types (l0-types) --->(l0-types)

draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types
ietf-layer1-types (l1-types) --->(l1types)

draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang
ietf-optical-impairment-topology (optical-imp-topo) --->(optical-imp-topo)

draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-topo-yang
ietf-otn-topology (otntopo) --->(otn-topo)

draft-ietf-ccamp-otn-tunnel-model
ietf-otn-tunnel (otn-tunnel) --->(otn-tunnel)

draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang
ietf-wson-topology  (wson) --->(wson-topo)


_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp