Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7139 (3944)

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

Hi CCAMP,

It is a bit like one of those spot-the-difference games ;-)

I see the inclusion of the letter 'T' in the left-hand column.

I believe this is as discussed on the list and is OK to be approved.

But I have a question:
Is the title of the table still OK without the addition of a 'T'?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: 02 April 2014 19:17
> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7139 (3944)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7139,
> "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport
> Networks".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7139&eid=3944
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Fred Gruman <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 5.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       ODUk.ts       Minimum          Nominal          Maximum
>       -----------------------------------------------------------
>       ODU2.ts    1,249,384.632    1,249,409.620     1,249,434.608
>       ODU3.ts    1,254,678.635    1,254,703.729     1,254,728.823
>       ODU4.ts    1,301,683.217    1,301,709.251     1,301,735.285
> 
>               Table 1: Actual TS Bit Rate of ODUk (in Kbps)
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       ODTUk.ts       Minimum          Nominal           Maximum
>       ------------------------------------------------------------
>       ODTU2.ts    1,249,384.632    1,249,409.620     1,249,434.608
>       ODTU3.ts    1,254,678.635    1,254,703.729     1,254,728.823
>       ODTU4.ts    1,301,683.217    1,301,709.251     1,301,735.285
> 
>               Table 1: Actual TS Bit Rate of ODUk (in Kbps)
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7139 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709
Optical
> Transport Networks
> Publication Date    : March 2014
> Author(s)           : F. Zhang, Ed., G. Zhang, S. Belotti, D. Ceccarelli, K.
Pithewan
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG