Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7139 (3944)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 02 April 2014 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5611A03C6 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.583
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.583 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_I_LETTER=-2, J_CHICKENPOX_42=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yz6voSGXilli for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34A1A03C5 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s32K35EK013070; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:03:06 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (13.17.90.92.rev.sfr.net [92.90.17.13]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s32K2ord013015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:03:03 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <20140402181652.9956D7FC3AA@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140402181652.9956D7FC3AA@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 21:02:49 +0100
Message-ID: <064901cf4eae$8f9ed1a0$aedc74e0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHSFw1mD5bMqOQ/n4J9nUIkAr+6/pr5LVgA
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-7.5.0.1017-20604.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.939-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.939-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: hls5oAVArl89lr9fRdNi6N/wYmMFcJSIgo2AmQWC5peObf10apLcScLm p4jPUF8t7REE2YVnJbsTx+qCcZt44TJmL3yrEczI9UVHiwLx0/KFzNNPDc6umLV5fSMRD1zq+RS bLVjWMfyJ1Bvvev+zQCHv1uPxeJPRu+Ep/j1O1gCmG+fak9r3aolz3/zUz3NyDO+DX+rUwfYc5Z b9Gn+Kytr5Hg+i8TwivgFPavwSfZzC5N8cNUn/Xq91/YHX0i1lwRK5Tk3x4wqabNoYojBQdv3qq AG+Rtg0+UsKPh5Jxsll3tpAIdU89E1+zyfzlN7y/sToY2qzpx6x5amWK2anSPoLR4+zsDTtGM6W 3U+Lnneefk9no+pPFe92P+h/GlAQM52Poi+RxmdkE9yND6vqHA==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/weD-hrwAwh3IEogTp7Jfw-8s9Zw
Cc: zhangguoying@mail.ritt.com.cn, sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.it, akatlas@gmail.com, dbrungard@att.com
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7139 (3944)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:03:30 -0000

Hi CCAMP,

It is a bit like one of those spot-the-difference games ;-)

I see the inclusion of the letter 'T' in the left-hand column.

I believe this is as discussed on the list and is OK to be approved.

But I have a question:
Is the title of the table still OK without the addition of a 'T'?

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]
> Sent: 02 April 2014 19:17
> To: zhangfatai@huawei.com; zhangguoying@mail.ritt.com.cn;
> sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.it; daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com;
> kpithewan@infinera.com; akatlas@gmail.com; adrian@olddog.co.uk;
> lberger@labn.net; dbrungard@att.com
> Cc: fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com; ccamp@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7139 (3944)
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7139,
> "GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709 Optical Transport
> Networks".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7139&eid=3944
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Fred Gruman <fred.gruman@us.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Section: 5.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       ODUk.ts       Minimum          Nominal          Maximum
>       -----------------------------------------------------------
>       ODU2.ts    1,249,384.632    1,249,409.620     1,249,434.608
>       ODU3.ts    1,254,678.635    1,254,703.729     1,254,728.823
>       ODU4.ts    1,301,683.217    1,301,709.251     1,301,735.285
> 
>               Table 1: Actual TS Bit Rate of ODUk (in Kbps)
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       ODTUk.ts       Minimum          Nominal           Maximum
>       ------------------------------------------------------------
>       ODTU2.ts    1,249,384.632    1,249,409.620     1,249,434.608
>       ODTU3.ts    1,254,678.635    1,254,703.729     1,254,728.823
>       ODTU4.ts    1,301,683.217    1,301,709.251     1,301,735.285
> 
>               Table 1: Actual TS Bit Rate of ODUk (in Kbps)
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7139 (draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-signaling-g709v3-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Control of Evolving G.709
Optical
> Transport Networks
> Publication Date    : March 2014
> Author(s)           : F. Zhang, Ed., G. Zhang, S. Belotti, D. Ceccarelli, K.
Pithewan
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG