IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling

"Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com> Tue, 29 October 2013 10:38 UTC

Return-Path: <giomarti@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4535B21E8145 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IJZLv1Pwm5g for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4DF21E811D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 03:38:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=429; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383043109; x=1384252709; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=RjInMaJahZjAk/x3Y5/7K8JaiBE/1Jmr3i3N9tc5PP4=; b=lRatoHa8XVx/yU99phZNGZ6KzHf5ZtghoI4p0Vgn9DXQCKyLSAvNPQpi /9LwbDWz71gaFhgDA3sb9HV4SjsQvkfdftXrLtdmiLiXdbprRJxuUvFPf BZEHnFdxqZpHv7Y2c1+4e0ho3QX420vM5hNHbT6IbtyGjZjyFpgygTi9f A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAFAB+Pb1KtJXG//2dsb2JhbABZgwc4VL8xgSgWdIImAQEEOj8QAgEIDhQUBQsyJQIEDgUIh38NuR2PFAIxB4MfgQ0DmTmJIoc3gWiBPoIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,592,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="277933920"
Received: from rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com ([173.37.113.191]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 Oct 2013 10:38:29 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com [173.36.12.78]) by rcdn-core2-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9TAcRPr008334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:38:28 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.14]) by xhc-aln-x04.cisco.com ([173.36.12.78]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 05:38:28 -0500
From: "Giovanni Martinelli (giomarti)" <giomarti@cisco.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling
Thread-Index: AQHO1JMAVmCoWaWmGEW5JbuHqIKecQ==
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:38:27 +0000
Message-ID: <0D7F95913F470A4B83AB5F5833A4390D0EE587D6@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <524AF9A9.3040006@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <524AF9A9.3040006@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [144.254.166.93]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <FE4D61A03C78274B8B66E31E403D1955@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - rwa-info, general-constraint-encode, rwa-wson-encode, gmpls-general-constraints-ospf-te, wson-signal-compatibility-ospf, wson-signaling
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:38:47 -0000

Hi all,

On Oct 1, 2013, at 18:34 , Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode-21
> (Standards Track)

We propose an encoding of ITU application codes on 64 bits of Optical Interface Class (Section 4.2), just wandering if we already had any ITU/Q6 feedback or we are just ok with proposed encoding.

I'm ok with the rest of LC documents

Cheers
G

v2.2.0 | Report a Bug | By Email