Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 03:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549341A1A9E
for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id LUcrSctRSZvQ for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB371A886C
for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:43:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com)
([172.18.7.190])
by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
with ESMTP id BNY32870; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.41) by
lhreml406-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 04:43:38 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.22]) by
nkgeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:43:30 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>,
"draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP7DmxZe4di09DEUSAb36hmAw2LZw4nFYQgANiRwCAAQp7EA==
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:30 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733759B2E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <20141020074350.21488.53873.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C92733758033@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
<544805C0.8060103@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <544805C0.8060103@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wpHHjvatP_VJYkNvEaQmqQY95lo
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>,
<mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>,
<mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:43:44 -0000
Hi Lou, Thanks a lot for your review and comments, please see my replies inline: > Jie, Authors, > I have a few comments: > > - Section 3.1, > I think intermediate node behavior related to processing of the A is unchanged > by this document so think you should drop the 3 lines that contain the phrase "... > intermediate nodes ..." Agree the behavior of intermediate node is unchanged, will remove the descriptions about intermediate node behavior in a new revision. > - Section 3.2 > The section is not clear if the A bit processing occurs / completes before > Loopback related processing begins or occurs coincidentally. (I read the last > sentence of the first paragraph saying the former and the last sentence of the > 2nd paragraph saying the latter.) Either way it should be clarified. The A bit (lock) processing needs to be completed before initiating loopback request. The last sentence of the 2nd paragraph was to emphasize that when signaling loopback, the A bit should be kept set to indicate the LSP is still in lock mode. We will rephrase the sentence to make it clearer. > Where is the Loopback (B) bit / Attribute Flag defined? This document, right? > Then the document, needs to state so in this section and in the IANA section. The Loopback bit was defined in the end of section 2 "Extensions to RSVP-TE". To make it clearer, will use subsections for each extension in the new revision. > Section 4, needs to be updated to follow RFC2360, See > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-1 > 0 > for a recent example. Thanks for pointing to this example. Will update the IANA section accordingly. > - Also please cleanup your id-nits, see > http://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-t > e-li-lb-04.txt Will clean this in the new revision. Best regards, Jie > > Lou > > On 10/20/2014 3:58 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > The only change in this new version is: > > > > - Update the references (one has become RFC) > > > > Your review and comments are highly appreciated. > > > > Many thanks, > > Jie > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > >> internet-drafts@ietf.org > >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 3:44 PM > >> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > >> Cc: ccamp@ietf.org > >> Subject: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Common Control and Measurement > >> Plane Working Group of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for Lock Instruct > and > >> Loopback > >> Authors : Jie Dong > >> Mach(Guoyi) Chen > >> Zhenqiang Li > >> Daniele Ceccarelli > >> Filename : draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04.txt > >> Pages : 8 > >> Date : 2014-10-20 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> This document specifies extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol - > >> Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) to support Lock Instruct (LI) and > >> Loopback (LB) mechanisms for Label Switched Paths (LSPs). These > >> mechanisms are applicable to technologies which use Generalized > >> Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) as control plane. > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-lb-04 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > >> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CCAMP mailing list > >> CCAMP@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list > > CCAMP@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp > > >
- [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-li-l… internet-drafts
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Lou Berger
- Re: [CCAMP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ccamp-rsvp-te-… Dongjie (Jimmy)