RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt
"PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri" <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be> Wed, 09 July 2008 13:00 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8BB28C0FA for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:00:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.776, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EcKbkVJSji7 for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC23A6872 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 06:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KGZCU-000M42-G5 for ccamp-data@psg.com; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:55:14 +0000
Received: from [62.23.212.27] (helo=smail5.alcatel.fr) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>) id 1KGZCQ-000M3I-Ay for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:55:12 +0000
Received: from FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com (frvelsbhs03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com [155.132.6.75]) by smail5.alcatel.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/ICT) with ESMTP id m69Ct694003900; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:55:06 +0200
Received: from FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com ([155.132.6.51]) by FRVELSBHS03.ad2.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 14:55:06 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:54:47 +0200
Message-ID: <00275A5B436CA441900CB10936742A38C87360@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <53CCFDD6E346CB43994852666C210E91046A6C5D@esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt
Thread-Index: AcjhqubgR+ijZDx5SFioiABWk9RslwADSs6gAAJyvpA=
References: <20080707061501.744433A68FD@core3.amsl.com> <48748C72.9080309@pi.nu> <53CCFDD6E346CB43994852666C210E91046A6C5D@esealmw116.eemea.ericsson.se>
From: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri <Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel-lucent.be>
To: Attila Takacs <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, ccamp <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2008 12:55:06.0945 (UTC) FILETIME=[033FE310:01C8E1C3]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 155.132.188.13
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>
attila, once you are at it, can u explain the following "to properly setup the remote data plane endpoints" ? what it actually means in the context: "Such an example is protection switching of bidirectional connections in Ethernet PBB-TE [IEEE-PBBTE] (currently under standardisation in IEEE). In this case revertiveness needs to be signalled by RSVP-TE during LSP establishment to properly setup the remote data plane endpoint." also do u need a V bit, or isn't the WTR time with a reserved value not sufficient e.g. 0x0 ? when for inst. the locally configured timer would be used (no timer signaled). the revertive operation is associated to LSP right ? why did you pull this into the 16-bit space for Link specific operation (before link flags ?) thx, -d. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org > [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Attila Takacs > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 2:34 PM > To: Loa Andersson; ccamp > Subject: RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt > > Hi Loa, > > I assume a part of your comment/question relates to problems with > reversion if LSP setup and holding priorities are mismatched. In this > case the worker may be already deleted before the reversion would take > place. This is certainly an interesting question... > > ...at a first thought an explicit revertive bit may be used > to override > the priorities for LSPs with revertive protection. > > Best regards, > Attila > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.nu] > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:01 PM > > To: ccamp; Attila Takacs > > Subject: Re: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt > > > > Attila, > > > > a neat draft that does what it sets out to do. For the moment > > I've no actual comments on the draft itself (might have when > > I'd time to think about in detail), but more meta-question. > > > > It is not a given that the revertive behavior always is > > beneficial. In networks that are very dynamic it might be > > optional to revert, let the traffic stay on the protecting > > path or replace them altogether. > > > > Wouldn't it be interesting to discuss more in detail when a > > revertive behavior is needed/wanted and when it is not. > > > > /Loa > > > > Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line > > Internet-Drafts directories. > > > > > > Title : GMPLS RSVP-TE recovery extension for > > data plane initiated reversion > > > Author(s) : A. Takacs, B. Tremblay > > > Filename : draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00.txt > > > Pages : 11 > > > Date : 2008-07-06 > > > > > > RSVP-TE recovery extensions are specified in [RFC4872] and > > [RFC4873]. > > > Currently these extensions cannot signal request for revertive > > > protection to the remote endpoint. This document defines a > > new bit to > > > signal this request and a new field to specify a wait-to-restore > > > interval.Requirements Language > > > > > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", > "SHALL NOT", > > > "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and > > "OPTIONAL" in this > > > document are to be interpreted as described in > > > > > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > > > > > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00 > > > .txt > > > > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > > > > > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader > > > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the > > > Internet-Draft. > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > I-D-Announce mailing list > > > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or > > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > > > > -- > > Loa Andersson > > > > Principal Networking Architect > > Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14 > > Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64 > > Kista, Sweden email: loa.andersson@acreo.se > > loa@pi.nu > > > >
- Re: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… Loa Andersson
- RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… Attila Takacs
- RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… Attila Takacs
- RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
- RE: I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-00… Attila Takacs
- some comments on I-D Action:draft-takacs-ccamp-re… Loa Andersson