Re: [CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8632 (6866)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Fri, 04 March 2022 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8953A0B5F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N34COsX6Fim2 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EEB93A0B3D for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3F6425C194; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xQIfeP1N6uyo; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46066425A344; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 10:11:25 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220304164723.394CF12EF93@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 10:11:24 -0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3A6952CE-7BED-4C05-9870-5B5874B0D579@amsl.com>
References: <20220304164723.394CF12EF93@rfc-editor.org>
To: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>, stefan@wallan.se, mbj@tail-f.com, ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wvrre1cmYwcV5Mdd_r2OagZrtrI>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8632 (6866)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 18:11:30 -0000

Greetings,

We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial.  
Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata 
report to “Technical”.  As Stream Approver, please review and set the 
Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/).

You may review the report at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6866

Please see https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ for further 
information on how to verify errata reports.

Further information on errata can be found at: 
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Mar 4, 2022, at 8:47 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8632,
> "A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6866
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Reshad Rahman <reshad@yahoo.com>
> 
> Section: 6
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>      container older-than {
>        presence "Age specification";
>        description
>          "Matches the 'last-status-change' leaf in the alarm.";
>        choice age-spec {
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>      container older-than {
>        presence "Age specification";
>        description
>          "Matches the 'last-changed' leaf in the alarm.";
>        choice age-spec {
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> There is no last-status-change leaf in alarm (and it seems there never was).
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8632 (draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-09)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management
> Publication Date    : September 2019
> Author(s)           : S. Vallin, M. Bjorklund
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>