Re: [CCAMP] Input for Terminology discussion: UNI definitions across different SDOs

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Thu, 07 November 2013 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0143311E8101 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:51:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.588, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CCOiuWOyqwAR for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:51:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.249.253]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 03CB821E8143 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 13:51:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 14261 invoked by uid 0); 7 Nov 2013 21:51:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 7 Nov 2013 21:51:25 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Cc:To:Subject:From; bh=JQgfaA1GFQY7VF94cPyYE1CLh/Ivpz96aEubPQt/x7o=; b=zbC4KMG4rE6NeECeAaL55YLdlqxoolOxYBpfy79bxTMmvr5r/tq5FtwLeFVZOQm/Zc9+3R1UHJ+k8BUjVaovGrMpKyO2oCdB2EYj5vAtKlrP3ssewUqKYsJUh0EOO7aY;
Received: from [69.89.31.113] (port=59940 helo=localhost) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1VeXU5-0005pl-1n; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 14:51:25 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Oscar González de Dios <ogondio@tid.es>
Message-ID: <c6bfa026.1383860837740@mail.labn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:51:17 -0800
User-Agent: ProfiMailGo/4.14.00
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Input for Terminology discussion: UNI definitions across different SDOs
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:52:03 -0000

Some additional references:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5921#section-3.4.3
Defines both uni and nni.

Also figures are corrected in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6215

Lou

On 11:25am, November 7, 2013, Oscar González de Dios wrote:
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp