[CCAMP] [Errata Rejected] RFC8632 (5953)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 13 July 2020 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3495E3A1109; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0lVYAZQ9MB99; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 130A93A0EF4; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CADE7F4074C; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
To: te.hasegawa2@gmail.com, stefan@wallan.se, mbj@tail-f.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: db3546@att.com, iesg@ietf.org, ccamp@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20200713211351.CADE7F4074C@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/wzF_tcQmUAzCUhvFOmposwn5hok>
Subject: [CCAMP] [Errata Rejected] RFC8632 (5953)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:15:01 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8632,
"A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5953

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Tetsuya Hasegawa <te.hasegawa2@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2019-12-31
Rejected by: Deborah Brungard (IESG)

Section: 3.5.1.

Original Text
-------------
   From a resource perspective, an alarm can, for example, have the
   following lifecycle: raise, change severity, change severity, clear,

Corrected Text
--------------
   From a resource perspective, an alarm can, for example, have the
   following lifecycle: raise, change severity, clear,

Notes
-----

 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
 Per authors and chairs, the current RFC text is correct as it exemplifies how the severity can change multiple times over the lifecycle of an alarm.

--------------------------------------
RFC8632 (draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-09)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management
Publication Date    : September 2019
Author(s)           : S. Vallin, M. Bjorklund
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Common Control and Measurement Plane
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG