[CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-02

Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <KEE@kamstrup.com> Wed, 19 September 2018 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <KEE@kamstrup.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76906130F04; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tX9XP1Aqq2zi; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kamstrup.com (mail.kamstrup.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E203130DDB; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 04:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCHANGE2010.kamstrup.dk ([::1]) by Exchange2010.kamstrup.dk ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0169.001; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:41:43 +0200
From: Karen Elisabeth Egede Nielsen <KEE@kamstrup.com>
To: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "stefan@wallan.se" <stefan@wallan.se>, "mbj@tail-f.com" <mbj@tail-f.com>
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-02
Thread-Index: AdRQCodrkWYiLZVDQVapWZ9icZtUKA==
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:41:42 +0000
Message-ID: <A81686D187412242AD51AAC709D0844334296B31@Exchange2010.kamstrup.dk>
Accept-Language: en-US, da-DK
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/xHXi7yWdfsA-NjiZBlFj-TreVLU>
Subject: [CCAMP] draft-ietf-ccamp-alarm-module-02
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:41:47 -0000


This draft is new to me and modelling of alarm management also somewhat....

Could you enlighten me on the relationship, if any,  in between the alarm module of this draft and the
Device/resource alarm state within RFC8348 (equivalently the EntityAlarmStatus of RFC4268) ?

E.g.  are the two they considered complementary mechanisms (modules), just different view glasses, or are they non-compatible or redundant ..?

Many Thanks in advance !

BR, Karen Nielsen