Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode

[Leeyoung <[e-mail]>]

Hi Lou,

All missing references are added. 

Yes, the "second 32 bit field is referring to "Additional fields as necessary per action" field shown on page 14."

Old: The second 32 bit field is a part of the base label used as a starting point in many of the specific formats.
New: The second 32 bit field (which is referred to by "Additional fields as necessary per action" in the below encoding) is a part of the base label used in many of the specific formats.

Attached is a working version of draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode-14.txt. 

Let me know if this is ready to publish.

Regards,
Young

-----Original Message-----
From: Lou Berger [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 1:53 PM
To: Leeyoung; CCAMP; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call: WSON documents - draft-ietf-ccamp-general-constraint-encode

Young, (all),

You have two idnit issues:
  == Missing Reference: 'RWA-INFO' is mentioned on line 198, but not defined
  == Missing Reference: 'RFC 6205' is mentioned on line 779, but not defined

I have just one question on this one:

> - section 2.2.
>    Labels are variable in lengh and need not be 4 bytes long.  This
>    needs to be represented and accounted for in the encodings defined
>    in this section.
> 
> YOUNG>> Agreed. Added the following sentence in Section 2.6 (new section due to shuffling):
>    "Labels are variable in length. The second 32 bit field is a part of the base label used as a
>    starting point in many of the specific formats."
> 

I don't understand what you mean by the "second 32 bit field" are you referring to the " Additional fields as necessary per action" field shown on page 14?

Thanks,

Lou