A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 24 October 2008 16:13 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E60728C20F for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:13:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.918
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.918 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.424, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsjYWD+UOULs for <ietfarch-ccamp-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECB43A6995 for <ccamp-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 09:13:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KtPCD-0005gj-ES for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:07:29 +0000
Received: from [62.128.201.249] (helo=asmtp2.iomartmail.com) by psg.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1KtPBz-0005fb-SY for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:07:21 +0000
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.8) with ESMTP id m9OG7DDx007231 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:07:13 +0100
Received: from your029b8cecfe (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9OG7AYM007185 for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:07:12 +0100
Message-ID: <002901c935f2$92f928d0$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 17:05:58 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <ccamp.ops.ietf.org>
Hi, This draft provides a specification of the BNF we already use in RSVP-TE and LMP and makes it available for use in future protocol extensions. I intend asking that this draft progress in the standards process relatively soon. Please review and comment as soon as possible. Thanks, Adrian ----- Original Message ----- From: <Internet-Drafts@ietf.org> To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2008 5:00 PM Subject: I-D Action:draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf-06.txt >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > > Title : Reduced Backus-Naur Form (RBNF) A Syntax Used in Various > Protocol Specifications > Author(s) : A. Farrel > Filename : draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf-06.txt > Pages : 12 > Date : 2008-10-24 > > Several protocols have been specified using a common variant of the > Backus-Naur Form (BNF) of representing message syntax. However, there > is no formal definition of this version of BNF. > > There is value in using the same variant of BNF for the set of > protocols that are commonly used together. This reduces confusion and > simplifies implementation. > > Updating existing documents to use some other variant of BNF that is > already formally documented would be a substantial piece of work. > > This document provides a formal definition of the variant of BNF that > has been used (that we call Reduced BNF), and makes it available for > use by new protocols. > > A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-common-bnf-06.txt
- A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP Adrian Farrel
- Re: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP tom.petch
- Re: A BNF specification for RSVP-GMPLS and LMP Adrian Farrel