Re: [CCAMP] How to move WSON related drafts
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Tue, 06 November 2012 15:02 UTC
Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3728121F898F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:02:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.057
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.057 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.208, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ia7DcxmLPReo for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy9.bluehost.com (oproxy9.bluehost.com [69.89.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DF7421F8957 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 07:01:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 3172 invoked by uid 0); 6 Nov 2012 15:01:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy9.bluehost.com with SMTP; 6 Nov 2012 15:01:31 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=wQdx5+XKy8wh3fUoVFX6cLfXovpzUBwUtNXYgMYRHLk=; b=NSQf4ZhI1+mlu+8FtoLQweUL8nLdHDKktTPvMdeZjavLBYF8u/0e5GnFEdFgWyFfdAh7T/MstqswZcJwBbrtiqWzOcY92ypOLyybXBUipmmVcC1nOcRBVnMfxmHPuGMA;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:54403 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1TVkeh-0003pK-1d; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:01:31 -0700
Message-ID: <5099264B.7050709@labn.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:01:31 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17290A0C74@dfweml511-mbb.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E17290A0C74@dfweml511-mbb.china.huawei.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>, DEBORAH A ATTLABS BRUNGARD <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] How to move WSON related drafts
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:02:00 -0000
Young, As indicated by the milestones, it is possible to progress some WSON documents before the signaling document. That said, if the documents can move as a group, this would be better from both a review and process perspective. So, we, the chairs, would like to understand just what is left to do in the signaling document before deciding this point. This is the basis for our request that status of all WSON documents be presented at this IETF. Some status will be presented later today. Let's hear what is said, see what related discussion we have on the list, and then go from there. Lou On 11/5/2012 7:01 PM, Leeyoung wrote: > Hi Lou and Deborah, > > > > After today’s CCAMP meeting, we realized that the current WSON signaling > draft (draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling -04) is contingent upon Cyril’s > draft (draft-margaria-ccamp-lsp-attribute-ero-02.txt). > > > > This dependency may keep the WSON signaling draft from moving forward > with other WSON drafts toward WG LC. > > > > My question to the chairs is if it would be possible to move the > non-signaling related WSON drafts first toward to WG LC. This is > actually consistent with the WG milestone statement (/copied below/) in > which the routing related WSON drafts are scheduled to move ahead of the > signaling related draft. > > > > /Dec 2012 / > > > > /Submit WSON routing related drafts for IESG review / > > /Jun 2013 / > > > > /Submit WSON signaling related draft for IESG review/ > > > > Thanks in advance for sharing your thought on this issue. > > > > Best Regards, > > Young >