Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)

Attila Takacs <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com> Fri, 05 December 2014 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C5181AD6CE; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:49:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TstCyH9Nu2mm; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg22.ericsson.net (sessmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11851A008C; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 11:49:15 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3a-f79116d000000fec-e9-54820c3ae03e
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sessmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 45.8F.04076.A3C02845; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:49:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB201.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.250]) by ESESSHC003.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:49:13 +0100
From: Attila Takacs <Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
Thread-Topic: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)
Thread-Index: AQHQEMSLyItfOS0YvEKmJXhRgrcACw==
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 19:49:13 +0000
Message-ID: <D0A74BB5.3A5DB%attila.takacs@ericsson.com>
References: <20140908192308.6BD2B180015@rfc-editor.org> <11ca01d010a2$fff2c130$ffd84390$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <11ca01d010a2$fff2c130$ffd84390$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.5.141003
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.148]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0A74BB53A5DBattilatakacsericssoncom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrDIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvja4VT1OIQV+3sMWPnhvMFp8eXmK2 eDLnBovF9p1LWCxaprxjtuhofsti0fpjB4sDu8fL/jmMHjtn3WX3aDnyltVjyZKfTB4fNjWz eazYvJIxgC2KyyYlNSezLLVI3y6BK2PDrttMBR96mSoOvJzO3sC48RNjFyMnh4SAicTzp++Y IGwxiQv31rN1MXJxCAkcYZR4/KKFHcJZzCgx5ccldpAqNgEDiQvNk5lBbBGBeIm5X56wgNjM ApOZJE6dUgOxhQXMJT4v28AGUWMhsf3ZNBYIW0+iZ+VSoG0cHCwCKhJ9/yVAwrxA5esvXAcb KSSQIXFh9zyw4zgFrCXWvpgMtpYR6Ljvp9YwQawSl7j1ZD7U0QISS/acZ4awRSVePv7HCmKL Aq2a9/AVG0RcSaJxyRNWiN4Yia2t1xkh9gpKnJz5hGUCo9gsJGNnISmbhaQMIq4jsWD3JzYI W1ti2cLXzDD2mQOPoXqtJd7feMWIrGYBI8cqRtHi1OLi3HQjI73Uoszk4uL8PL281JJNjMDo P7jlt9UOxoPPHQ8xCnAwKvHwbpBvDBFiTSwrrsw9xCjNwaIkzrvw3LxgIYH0xJLU7NTUgtSi +KLSnNTiQ4xMHJxSDYwp4Wp2uvbs4jcNbulNXnh8wrJ1l1QPVcrLzHgb4zV1xu4T/97/kjl/ reBX7aczAU0vXolslbnb4RtnvXIJ8/Sf1v/XKC6dsCn4Z9lpy9oItcaCs82W26TNMp6lBN3Z caK2N+tkrMUe08ecbP//9nA/rljexcdy5NuL6hOJCal69n9CpV48kS1UYinOSDTUYi4qTgQA 9XStwt8CAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/z0YokPhS8t4U2gJqT7-LXmVEWVI
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "akatlas@gmail.com" <akatlas@gmail.com>, "dbrungard@att.com" <dbrungard@att.com>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 19:49:19 -0000

Hi Adrian,
Yes, I think we should do the simple fix as you have suggested.
Thanks,
Attila
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk<mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>>
Date: Friday, December 5, 2014 at 7:49 AM
To: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com<mailto:gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>>
Cc: "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>, "teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>" <teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>>, Ericsson <attila.takacs@ericsson.com<mailto:attila.takacs@ericsson.com>>, Don Fedyk <don.fedyk@hp.com<mailto:don.fedyk@hp.com>>, "hejia@huawei.com<mailto:hejia@huawei.com>" <hejia@huawei.com<mailto:hejia@huawei.com>>, "akatlas@gmail.com<mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>" <akatlas@gmail.com<mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>>, Berger Lou <lberger@labn.net<mailto:lberger@labn.net>>, Deborah Brungard <dbrungard@att.com<mailto:dbrungard@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7260 (4106)


Hi Greg,



I'm returning to this after an indecent interval.



I checked with IANA and they are OK that we can make this sort of change with an Errata Report and they are happy.



So now we have to agree what it should say.



There is an error in your suggested change, I think because in the first table you show 65533 as IETF review, and in the second as reserved for experimentation.



I am keen to make only the minimal changes to fix the obvious bugs. Therefore I think there is no need to reserve 65535 and it can remain as an experimental value.



That leaves us with...



    IANA has created the "OAM Sub-TLVs" sub-registry of the "RSVP-TE OAM

    Configuration Registry" as follows:

    Range       | Note                         | Registration Procedures

    ------------+------------------------------|------------------------

    0-31        | Generic Sub-TLVs             | IETF Review

   32-65533    | Technology-specific Sub-TLVs | IETF Review

    65534-65535 | Experimental Sub-TLVs        | Reserved for

                                               |   Experimental Use

    IANA has populated the registry as follows:

       Sub-TLV Type | Description                   | Reference

       -------------+-------------------------------+----------

           0        | Reserved                      | [RFC7260]

           1        | OAM Function Flags Sub-TLV    | [RFC7260]

           2-65533  | Unassigned                    |

       65534-65535  | Reserved for Experimental Use | [RFC7260]



Is everyone OK with that change?



Thanks,

Adrian