[CCAMP] New Liaison Statement, "Application Codes for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks"

Liaison Statement Management Tool <lsmt@ietf.org> Fri, 16 January 2015 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lsmt@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1731B29F3; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:55:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5bSKHs6WP2Nz; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:55:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A381AD371; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:55:12 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Liaison Statement Management Tool <lsmt@ietf.org>
To: greg.jones@itu.int
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.0.p8
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150116175512.4392.88935.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:55:12 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zeBCHFr86ZGjE3FmObXkjrkt4Qk>
Cc: daniele.cecccarelli@ericsson.com, lbpanslow@ciena.com, Peter.Stassar@huawei.com, akatlas@juniper.net, iesg@ietf.org, tsbsg15@itu.int, ccamp@ietf.org, ghani.abbas@ericsson.com
Subject: [CCAMP] New Liaison Statement, "Application Codes for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks"
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:55:18 -0000

Title: Application Codes for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks
Submission Date: 2015-01-16
URL of the IETF Web page: http://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1377/
Please reply by 2015-03-02
From: The IETF (John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>)
To: ITU-T SG 15  (greg.jones@itu.int)
Cc: ghani.abbas@ericsson.com,lbpanslow@ciena.com,akatlas@juniper.net,Malcolm.BETTS@zte.com.cn,daniele.cecccarelli@ericsson.com,adrian@olddog.co.uk,greg.jones@itu.int,kam.lam@alcatel-lucent.com,scott.mansfield@ericsson.com,Peter.Stassar@huawei.com,sshew@ciena.com,Steve.Trowbridge@alcatel-lucent.com,zhangfatai@huawei.com,ccamp@ietf.org,tsbsg15@itu.int,iesg@ietf.org
Response Contact: jdrake@juniper.net
Technical Contact: jdrake@juniper.net
Purpose: For comment

Body: Dear Q6/15 (WP2/15),

The CCAMP working group of the IETF would like to draft the attention of Q6/15 to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-rwa-wson-encode/ . This document describes encodings for a number of parameters that will be used in GMPLS protocols for operation of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks.
The document is in its final stages and will soon progress to IETF last call.
We would particularly welcome your review of sections 4.1.1-4.1.4. These sections describe the encoding of Application Codes as described in G.698.1, G.698.2, G.959.1, and G.695. The questions you might like to consider in this respect are:
- Are we capturing current application codes?
  In other words, are our references correct and correctly used?
- Are there any application codes we are missing?
  Is our set of references correct and have we included all of the application codes in the references?
- Have we captured all of the parameters of the application codes?
  In our attempt to capture the application codes into formats we can use in our protocols, have we found all of the parameters that comprise the application codes?
- Are the fields for each parameter of each application code appropriately sized and with the correct ranges?
  In other words, will we be able to properly encode the application codes defined today and their possible future extensions?
In view of the progress of this work, we would be very happy to receive informal responses and guidance from individuals or from the Question as a whole if it has time to formulate an agreed response. Please use the CCAMP mailing list to provide input in accordance with standard IETF process.  
Many thanks for your attention.
Fatai Zhang and Daniele Ceccarelli (CCAMP WG chairs)

No document has been attached