Re: [CCAMP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: (with COMMENT)

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Fri, 13 October 2017 07:23 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B24E13217D; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IufoTdFSaVus; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1777E126B7E; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DQO25893; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:23:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.47) by lhreml702-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.43) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 08:23:10 +0100
Received: from DGGEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.204]) by DGGEMA406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.47]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:23:00 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension@ietf.org>, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHTQkWUtqn/9xtFuECeVA4bkQvPsKLhY05g
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:22:59 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FC759251B@DGGEMA501-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <150769446602.24735.13620615617776736603.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <150769446602.24735.13620615617776736603.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.169.30.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020203.59E069DF.015B, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.204, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 0424380ed33649892163b85b2f277019
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccamp/zguhLvAXfv1KD53ROKB08M0ytmY>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 07:23:17 -0000

Hi Ben,

Thanks for your comments. 
We will address all your comments in next version. 

BR,
Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 12:01 PM
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension@ietf.org; Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>; ccamp-chairs@ietf.org; Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>; ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

 I support Adam's DISCUSS.

It seems odd to find the terminology section before section 1.  Also, please consider using the boilerplate from 8174, especially since there are lower case instances of at least "should".

I think the reference to RFC5920 needs to be normative, since reading that document seems necessary to understand the security considerations.