[CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
"Tobias Gondrom" <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 01 March 2017 15:39 UTC
Return-Path: <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
X-Original-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9602129572; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org header.d=gondrom.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFmt6uvuExsW; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gondrom.org (www.gondrom.org [5.35.241.16]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56358129570; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seraph (unknown [103.70.220.18]) by gondrom.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DA61648D6; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 16:39:37 +0100 (CET)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=RblfrvxXhRpG6LnHDHLDuN1Ye30qZXGbmMlgaNd108qBj0l2o3QgGQJMZL4KRXI5jKnXna8H+AkOcjKaMUILvS84EwmRmqFqp/sKmAtDWfuiwMreLFkBK06ayyeorYyD/bKWy0P2Ar2sSCe/PCY7ZZaEuZ48KF97L0PvhKyS9y0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:Disposition-Notification-To;
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
To: ccg@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 23:39:31 +0800
Message-ID: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAOjRlCnUFtBPvlm6+YVPaNkBAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AABAAAABfNH4XgNA7SY8GRkiZ6TvuAQAAAAA=@gondrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_096F_01D292E5.1706E6A0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdKSoXe3A2EO8TV+TSSfoIU3tce0lg==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ccg/AqxOB_41E0rqsyNSSR1Yg2rcrik>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 07:41:56 -0800
Cc: 'Trustees' <trustees@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements
X-BeenThere: ccg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IANA IPR Community Coordination Group <ccg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ccg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccg>, <mailto:ccg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:39:48 -0000
Dear all, We are in the process of transferring the IANA domains to the Trust from ICANN using CSC as the registrar. The agreement with CSC requires the incorporation of the License Agreements' Exhibit E Domain Name Registrar Requirements. Exhibit E is the same in each of the three license agreements between the Trust and ICANN. The implementation of the requirements needed additional details than in the current Exhibit E. These details have been worked out with ICANN and approved by the IETF Trust for review and acceptance by the CCG. Specifically, under the circumstance where the Administrative and Technical Contacts must approve the change to the Technical Contact the Registrar must provide notice of a receipt of a request to each to change the Technical Contact. Additionally, under the circumstance where the Registrant can override the need for the other parties to approve a change to the Technical Contact, the Registrant must provide documentation that notice of the change was provided to both the Administrative and Technical Contacts and that no response was received after a period of no less than ten business days. These conditions are also incorporated under the circumstances where the domain is set to prohibit registrar transfers and to prohibit deletions. A markup of the attached License Agreement Exhibit E reflects those proposed details. CSC has stated that it can implement the proposed changes. Section 3.2 e (ii) of the Community Agreement provides that each Operational Community accepts the "Initial License Agreement", which was done. The Trust, together with the current Operator, propose changes to the License Agreement and requests that the Operational Communities accept these changes. Following acceptance of these proposed changes it is believed the next steps to be: a. Community Review b. Trust and ICANN execute amendments to the three License Agreements c. Incorporate the changes in CSC Agreement Schedule A (Schedule A is the same as Exhibit E of the License Agreements) d. Trust puts Schedule A of the CSC Agreement out for Community Review e. Community Review f. Trust executes CSC Agreement g. CSC Test of conformance to the requirements h. All IANA domains transferred upon successful test Your feedback by 20 March 2017 on the proposed amendments to the License Agreements and the next steps are appreciated. Best regards, Tobias Gondrom Chair IETF Trust
- [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Greg Shatan
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Russ Housley
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements Alan Barrett
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … John Curran
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] [Trustees] Proposed Changes to License … Ray Pelletier
- Re: [CCG] Proposed Changes to License Agreements CW Mail